Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early Ovarian Malignancies

Author:

Zimmermann Julia S. M.1ORCID,Ramisch Pauline1,Radosa Marc P.12,Radosa Christoph G.3,Kaya Askin C.1,Brucker Sara Y.4ORCID,Taran Florin A.5ORCID,Ulrich Uwe A.6,Hackethal Andreas7,Deeken Martin8,Sütterlin Marc9,Tuschy Benjamin9,Solomayer Erich-Franz1,Radosa Julia C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, D-66421 Homburg, Germany

2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Bremen Nord, D-28755 Bremen, Germany

3. Institute and Policlinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical University, TU Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany

4. Department of Gynecology, Tübingen University Hospital, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

5. Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany

6. Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther Hospital, Johannesstift Diakonie, D-14193 Berlin, Germany

7. Frauenklinik an der Elbe, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany

8. Department of Gynecology, D-66346 Püttlingen, Germany

9. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany

Abstract

The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has increased in the last decade due to increased maternal age, increased incidence of ovarian malignancies in younger patients, and technical advances in surgery. Data on oncological safety and fertility outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic FSS are sparse, but some retrospective studies have shown that open FSS may be offered to selected patients. We assessed the role of minimally invasive FSS in comparison with radical surgery (RS) in terms of oncological safety and reproductive outcomes after FSS in this multicenter study. Eighty patients with FIGO stage I/II ovarian cancer treated with laparoscopic FSS or RS between 01/2000 and 10/2018 at the participating centers (comprehensive gynecological cancer centers with minimally invasive surgical expertise) were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively kept data. Case–control (n = 40 each) matching according to the FIGO stage was performed. Progression-free survival [150 (3–150) and 150 (5–150) months; p = 0.61] and overall survival [36 (3–150) and 50 (1–275) months; p = 0.65] did not differ between the FSS and RS groups. Eight (25.8%) women became pregnant after FSS, resulting in seven (22.5%) deliveries; three (37.5%) patients conceived after in vitro fertilization, and five (62.5%) conceived spontaneously. Laparoscopic FSS seems to be applicable and oncologically safe for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, with adequate fertility outcomes.

Funder

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Endoskopie

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference39 articles.

1. Ovarian cancer;Jayson;Lancet,2014

2. Cancer statistics;Siegel;CA-Cancer J. Clin.,2016

3. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology;Benedet;Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.,2000

4. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer;Heintz;Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.,2006

5. EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary;Sant;Eur. J. Cancer,2009

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3