The Impact of Melanoma Imaging Biomarker Cues on Detection Sensitivity and Specificity in Melanoma versus Clinically Atypical Nevi

Author:

Agüero Rosario1ORCID,Buchanan Kendall L.2ORCID,Navarrete-Dechent Cristián34ORCID,Marghoob Ashfaq A.4ORCID,Stein Jennifer A.5ORCID,Landy Michael S.67ORCID,Leachman Sancy A.8ORCID,Linden Kenneth G.910ORCID,Garcet Sandra11,Krueger James G.11ORCID,Gareau Daniel S.11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330024, Chile

2. Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30904, USA

3. Melanoma and Skin Cancer Unit, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330024, Chile

4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Skin Cancer Center, New York, NY 10022, USA

5. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA

6. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA

7. Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA

8. Dermatology Department, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA

9. Dermatology Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA

10. Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA

11. Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA

Abstract

Incorporation of dermoscopy and artificial intelligence (AI) is improving healthcare professionals’ ability to diagnose melanoma earlier, but these algorithms often suffer from a “black box” issue, where decision-making processes are not transparent, limiting their utility for training healthcare providers. To address this, an automated approach for generating melanoma imaging biomarker cues (IBCs), which mimics the screening cues used by expert dermoscopists, was developed. This study created a one-minute learning environment where dermatologists adopted a sensory cue integration algorithm to combine a single IBC with a risk score built on many IBCs, then immediately tested their performance in differentiating melanoma from benign nevi. Ten participants evaluated 78 dermoscopic images, comprised of 39 melanomas and 39 nevi, first without IBCs and then with IBCs. Participants classified each image as melanoma or nevus in both experimental conditions, enabling direct comparative analysis through paired data. With IBCs, average sensitivity improved significantly from 73.69% to 81.57% (p = 0.0051), and the average specificity improved from 60.50% to 67.25% (p = 0.059) for the diagnosis of melanoma. The index of discriminability (d′) increased significantly by 0.47 (p = 0.002). Therefore, the incorporation of IBCs can significantly improve physicians’ sensitivity in melanoma diagnosis. While more research is needed to validate this approach across other healthcare providers, its use may positively impact melanoma screening practices.

Funder

NIH HHS/United States

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3