The Importance of Optimal Thermal Ablation Margins in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies

Author:

Chlorogiannis David-Dimitris1ORCID,Sotirchos Vlasios S.2ORCID,Georgiades Christos3,Filippiadis Dimitrios4,Arellano Ronald S.5,Gonen Mithat6,Makris Gregory C.7,Garg Tushar5ORCID,Sofocleous Constantinos T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

2. Weill-Cornell Medical College, Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA

3. Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

4. 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “Attikon”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece

5. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA

6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA

7. Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St Thomas Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Results: Overall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58–5.03; p-value < 0.001). When margins less than 5 mm were additionally confirmed by using 3D software, a 5.1 times higher risk for LTP (n = 4 studies, RR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.45–17.90; p-value < 0.001) was recorded. Moreover, a thermal ablation margin of less than 10 mm but over 5 mm remained significantly associated with 3.64 times higher risk for LTP vs. minimal margin larger than 10 mm (n = 7 studies, RR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.31–10.10; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.

Funder

NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3