Evaluation of Intratumoral Response Heterogeneity in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Its Impact on Patient Overall Survival: Findings from 10,551 Patients in the ARCAD Database

Author:

Ou Fang-Shu1ORCID,Ahn Daniel H.2,Dixon Jesse G.1ORCID,Grothey Axel3,Lou Yiyue4,Kasi Pashtoon M.5ORCID,Hubbard Joleen M.6ORCID,Van Cutsem Eric7,Saltz Leonard B.8,Schmoll Hans-Joachim9,Goldberg Richard M.10ORCID,Venook Alan P.11,Hoff Paulo12,Douillard Jean-Yves13,Hecht J. Randolph14,Hurwitz Herbert15,Punt Cornelis J. A.16,Koopman Miriam17,Bokemeyer Carsten18ORCID,Fuchs Charles S.19,Diaz-Rubio Eduardo20,Tebbutt Niall C.21,Cremolini Chiara22,Kabbinavar Fairooz F.23,Bekaii-Saab Tanios2,Chibaudel Benoist24,Yoshino Takayuki25,Zalcberg John26ORCID,Adams Richard A.2728ORCID,de Gramont Aimery24,Shi Qian1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

2. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA

3. West Cancer Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38104, USA

4. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA 02210, USA

5. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

6. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

7. Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

8. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, Martin-Luther-University Halle/Saale, 06120 Halle, Germany

10. West Virginia University Cancer Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

11. Department of Medicine, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

12. Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil

13. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Nantes Medical School, 44035 Nantes, France

14. Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

15. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA

16. Julius Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands

17. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

18. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany

19. Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

20. Department of Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain

21. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

22. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy

23. Cardiff Oncology, San Diego, CA 92121, USA

24. Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France

25. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba 277-8577, Japan

26. School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia

27. Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK

28. Velindre Cancer Center, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogeneous disease that can evoke discordant responses to therapy among different lesions in individual patients. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria do not take into consideration response heterogeneity. We explored and developed lesion-based measurement response criteria to evaluate their prognostic effect on overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled in 17 first-line clinical trials, who had mCRC with ≥ 2 lesions at baseline, and a restaging scan by 12 weeks were included. For each patient, lesions were categorized as a progressing lesion (PL: > 20% increase in the longest diameter (LD)), responding lesion (RL: > 30% decrease in LD), or stable lesion (SL: neither PL nor RL) based on the 12-week scan. Lesion-based response criteria were defined for each patient as follows: PL only, SL only, RL only, and varied responses (mixture of RL, SL, and PL). Lesion-based response criteria and OS were correlated using stratified multivariable Cox models. The concordance between OS and classifications was measured using the C statistic. Results: Among 10,551 patients with mCRC from 17 first-line studies, varied responses were noted in 51.6% of patients, among whom, 3.3% had RL/PL at 12 weeks. Among patients with RL/SL, 52% had stable disease (SD) by RECIST 1.1, and they had a longer OS (median OS (mOS) = 19.9 months) than those with SL only (mOS = 16.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.76, 0.85), p < 0.001), although a shorter OS than those with RL only (mOS = 25.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.42 (1.32, 1.53), p < 0.001). Among patients with SL/PL, 74% had SD by RECIST 1.1, and they had a longer OS (mOS = 9.0 months) than those with PL only (mOS = 8.0 months, HR (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.57, 0.98), p = 0.040), yet a shorter OS than those with SL only (mOS = 16.8 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.98 (1.80, 2.18), p < 0.001). These associations were consistent across treatment regimen subgroups. The lesion-based response criteria showed slightly higher concordance than RECIST 1.1, although it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Varied responses at first restaging are common among patients receiving first-line therapy for mCRC. Our lesion-based measurement criteria allowed for better mortality discrimination, which could potentially be informative for treatment decision-making and influence patient outcomes.

Funder

Daniel J. Sargent, Career Development Award in Cancer Research

ARCAD Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference38 articles.

1. Reporting results of cancer treatment;Miller;Cancer,1981

2. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors;Therasse;J. Natl. Cancer Inst.,2000

3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2023, August 11). Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics, Guidance for Industry, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/71195/download.

4. European Medicines Agency (2023, August 11). Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—Scientific Guideline. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/evaluation-anticancer-medicinal-products-man-scientific-guideline.

5. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1);Eisenhauer;Eur. J. Cancer,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3