Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
2. Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
3. Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive brain cancer. To model GBM in research, orthotopic brain tumor models, including syngeneic models like GL261 and genetically engineered mouse models like TRP, are used. In longitudinal studies, tumor growth and the treatment response are typically tracked with in vivo imaging, including bioluminescence imaging (BLI), which is quick, cost-effective, and easily quantifiable. However, BLI requires luciferase-tagged cells, and recent studies indicate that the luciferase gene can elicit an immune response, leading to tumor rejection and experimental variation. We sought to optimize the engraftment of two luciferase-expressing GBM models, GL261 Red-FLuc and TRP-mCherry-FLuc, showing differences in tumor take, with GL261 Red-FLuc cells requiring immunocompromised mice for 100% engraftment. Immunohistochemistry and MRI revealed distinct tumor characteristics: GL261 Red-FLuc tumors were well-demarcated with densely packed cells, high mitotic activity, and vascularization. In contrast, TRP-mCherry-FLuc tumors were large, invasive, and necrotic, with perivascular invasion. Quantifying the tumor volume using the HALO® AI analysis platform yielded results comparable to manual measurements, providing a standardized and efficient approach for the reliable, high-throughput analysis of luciferase-expressing tumors. Our study highlights the importance of considering tumor engraftment when using luciferase-expressing GBM models, providing insights for preclinical research design.
Funder
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health
Northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati UK Alumni Club Fellowship
Reference54 articles.
1. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020;Ostrom;Neuro Oncol.,2023
2. Neurosurgery’s Impact on Neuro-Oncology—”Can We Do Better?”—Lessons Learned Over 50 Years;Robin;Neurosurgery,2022
3. Seker-Polat, F., Pinarbasi Degirmenci, N., Solaroglu, I., and Bagci-Onder, T. (2022). Tumor Cell Infiltration into the Brain in Glioblastoma: From Mechanisms to Clinical Perspectives. Cancers, 14.
4. Mouse models of glioblastoma for the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies;Haddad;Neurooncol. Adv.,2021
5. Bourré, L. (2024, March 15). Tumor Homograft Model Generation: Dissociated Tumor Cells vs Tumor Fragments—Crown Bioscience. Available online: https://blog.crownbio.com/tumor-homograft-models-dtc-tumor-fragments.