Survival of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Hematologic Malignancies—A Real-World Analysis
Author:
Lange Stefan A.1, Schliemann Christoph2, Engelbertz Christiane1ORCID, Feld Jannik3, Makowski Lena1ORCID, Gerß Joachim3ORCID, Dröge Patrik4ORCID, Ruhnke Thomas4ORCID, Günster Christian4ORCID, Reinecke Holger1, Köppe Jeanette3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology I—Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany 2. Department of Medicine A, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany 3. Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany 4. AOK Research Institute (WIdO), D-10178 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Background: The impact of the encounter between coronary heart disease (CHD) and cancer, and in particular hematologic malignancies (HM), remains poorly understood. Objective: The aim of this analysis was to clarify how HM affects the prognosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed German health insurance data from 11 regional Ortskrankenkassen (AOK) of patients hospitalized for ACS between January 2010 and December 2018, matched by age, sex and all comorbidities for short- and long-term survival and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: Of 439,716 patients with ACS, 2104 (0.5%) also had an HM. Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorders (27.7%), lymphocytic leukemias (24.8%), and multiple myeloma (22.4%) predominated. These patients were about 6 years older (78 vs. 72 years *). They had an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, 18.2 vs. 34.9% *) less often and more often had a non-STEMI (NSTEMI, 81.8 vs. 65.1% *). With the exception of dyslipidemia, these patients had more concomitant and previous cardiovascular disease and a worse NYHA stage. They were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (65.3 vs. 71.6% *) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 44.3 vs. 52.0% *), although the number of bleeding events was not relevantly increased (p = 0.22). After adjustment for the patients’ risk profile, the HM was associated with reduced long-term survival. However, this was not true for short-term survival. Here, there was no difference in the STEMI patients, * p < 0.001. Conclusion: Survival in ACS and HM is significantly lower, possibly due to the avoidance of PCI because of a perceived increased risk of bleeding.
Funder
G-BA, Innovationsfonds
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference30 articles.
1. Shared Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer;Koene;Circulation,2016 2. Committee for Clinical Cardiovascular Medicine of the German Cardiac Society. Onco-Cardiology: Consensus Paper of the German Cardiac Society, the German Society for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects and the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology;Rassaf;Clin. Res. Cardiol.,2020 3. Acute Myocardial Infarction Trends in Europe (AMITIE) Study Investigators. Twenty-five-year trends in myocardial infarction attack and mortality rates, and case-fatality, in six European populations;Salomaa;Heart,2015 4. Lange, S.A., Feld, J., Kühnemund, L., Köppe, J., Makowski, L., Engelbertz, C.M., Gerß, J., Dröge, P., Ruhnke, T., and Günster, C. (2021). Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Cancer Patients, a ‘Real World’ Analysis with 175,000 Patients. Cancers, 13. 5. An emerging trend of rapid increase of leukemia but not all cancers in the aging population in the United States;Hao;Sci. Rep.,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|