Is There an Added Value of Quantitative DCE-MRI by Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?

Author:

Jager Auke1,Oddens Jorg R.12ORCID,Postema Arnoud W.3ORCID,Miclea Razvan L.4,Schoots Ivo G.56ORCID,Nooijen Peet G. T. A.7,van der Linden Hans7,Barentsz Jelle O.8,Heijmink Stijn W. T. P. J.6,Wijkstra Hessel2,Mischi Massimo2ORCID,Turco Simona2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands

3. Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Urology, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands

4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands

5. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands

6. Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Department of Pathology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5223 GZ ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

8. Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegenfi, The Netherlands

Abstract

In this multicenter, retrospective study, we evaluated the added value of magnetic resonance dispersion imaging (MRDI) to standard multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for PCa detection. The study included 76 patients, including 51 with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), who underwent radical prostatectomy and had an mpMRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists performed three separate randomized scorings based on mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI. Radical prostatectomy histopathology was used as the reference standard. Imaging and histopathology were both scored according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System V2.0 sector map. Sensitivity and specificity for PCa detection were evaluated for mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI. Inter- and intra-observer variability for both radiologists was evaluated using Cohen’s Kappa. On a per-patient level, sensitivity for csPCa for radiologist 1 (R1) for mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI was 0.94, 0.82 and 0.94, respectively. For the second radiologist (R2), these were 0.78, 0.94 and 0.96. R1 detected 4% additional csPCa cases using MRDI compared to mpMRI, and R2 detected 20% extra csPCa cases using MRDI. Inter-observer agreement was significant only for MRDI (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.4250, p = 0.004). The results of this study show the potential of MRDI to improve inter-observer variability and the detection of csPCa.

Funder

Center for Translational Molecular Medicine

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3