Feasibility of Monitoring Response to Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treatment with a Methylation-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Approach
Author:
Büttner Thomas1ORCID, Dietrich Dimo2, Zarbl Romina2, Klümper Niklas1ORCID, Ellinger Jörg1ORCID, Krausewitz Philipp1ORCID, Ritter Manuel1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Venusberg-Campus 1, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
Abstract
Background: Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCA) poses challenges in treatment response assessment, particularly in cases where prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels do not reliably indicate a response. Liquid biopsy, focusing on circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) methylation analysis as a proxy for circulating tumor DNA, offers a non-invasive and cost-effective approach. This study explores the potential of two methylation markers, short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) and Septin 9 (SEPT9), as on-mPCA-treatment biomarkers. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 11 mPCA patients undergoing various treatments. Quantitative assessment of hypermethylated SHOX2 (mSHOX2) and SEPT9 (mSEPT9) levels in ccfDNA was conducted through methylation-specific real-time PCR. Early and overall dynamics of PSA, mSHOX2, and mSEPT9 were analyzed. Statistical evaluation employed Wilcoxon tests. Results: mSHOX2 demonstrated a significant decline post-treatment in patients with a radiographic treatment response as well as in an early treatment setting. mSEPT9 and PSA exhibited non-significant declines. In individual cases, biomarker dynamics revealed unique patterns compared to PSA. Discussion: mSHOX2 and mSEPT9 exhibit dynamics on mPCA treatment. This proof-of-concept study lays the groundwork for further investigation into these markers as valuable additions to treatment response monitoring in mPCA. Further validation in larger cohorts is essential for establishing clinical utility.
Reference33 articles.
1. Mottet, N., Cornford, P., van de Bergh, R.C.N., Briers, E., Eberli, E., De Meerleer, G., De Santis, M., Gillessen, S., Grummet, J., and Expert Patient Advocate (European Prostate Cancer Coalition/Europa UOMO) (2023, November 24). EAU–EANM–ESTRO–ESUR–ISUP–SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2023 Update. Available online: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer. 2. Sartor, A.O., la Fougère, C., Essler, M., Ezziddin, S., Kramer, G., Elllinger, J., Nordquist, L., Sylvester, J., Paganelli, G., and Peer, A. (2021). Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand following radium-223 treatment in men with bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Real-world clinical experience. J. Nucl. Med. 3. Safety and survival of docetaxel and cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer;Kreis;BJU Int.,2022 4. PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An analysis of 22 trials;Francini;Tumor Biol.,2014 5. PSA response to cabazitaxel is associated with improved progression-free survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The non-interventional QoLiTime study;Hammerer;World J. Urol.,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|