Hypnosis-Assisted Awake Craniotomy for Eloquent Brain Tumors: Advantages and Pitfalls

Author:

Cossu Giulia12ORCID,Vandenbulcke Alberto1,Zaccarini Sonia34,Gaudet John G.3,Hottinger Andreas F.25,Rimorini Nina4,Potie Arnaud3,Beaud Valerie6,Guerra-Lopez Ursula6,Daniel Roy T.12,Berna Chantal4,Messerer Mahmoud12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

2. L. Lundin and Family Brain Tumor Research Center, Departments of Oncology and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

3. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

4. Center for Integrative and Complementary Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, The Sense and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

5. Division of Neuro-oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

6. Service of Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation, University Hospital of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Background: Awake craniotomy (AC) is recommended for the resection of tumors in eloquent areas. It is traditionally performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC), which relies on hypnotics and opioids. Hypnosis-assisted AC (HAAC) is an emerging technique that aims to provide psychological support while reducing the need for pharmacological sedation and analgesia. We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent AC under HAAC or MAC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, anesthetic, surgical, and neuropsychological data of patients who underwent awake surgical resection of eloquent brain tumors under HAAC or MAC. We used Mann–Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and repeated-measures analyses of variance to identify statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level. Results: A total of 22 patients were analyzed, 14 in the HAAC group and 8 in the MAC group. Demographic, radiological, and surgical characteristics as well as postoperative outcomes were similar. Patients in the HAAC group received less remifentanil (p = 0.047) and propofol (p = 0.002), but more dexmedetomidine (p = 0.025). None of them received ketamine as a rescue analgesic. Although patients in the HAAC group experienced higher levels of perioperative pain (p < 0.05), they reported decreasing stress levels (p = 0.04) and greater levels of satisfaction (p = 0.02). Conclusion: HAAC is a safe alternative to MAC as it reduces perioperative stress and increases overall satisfaction. Further research is necessary to assess whether hypnosis is clinically beneficial.

Funder

Lundin Family Brain Tumor Centre under the auspices of the Foundation CHUV of the University Hospital of Lausanne

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. Technical nuances of awake brain tumor surgery and the role of maximum safe resection;Berger;J. Neurosurg. Sci.,2015

2. Maximizing safe resection of low- and high-grade glioma;Berger;J. Neurooncol.,2016

3. The risk of getting worse: Surgically acquired deficits, perioperative complications, and functional outcomes after primary resection of glioblastoma;Gulati;World Neurosurg.,2011

4. Cognition and resective surgery for diffuse infiltrative glioma: An overview;Klein;J. Neurooncol.,2012

5. Advanced Ultrasound Imaging in Glioma Surgery: Beyond Gray-Scale B-mode;Perin;Front. Oncol.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3