Characterizing the Relationship between Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs), DNA Methylation Quantitative Trait Loci (mQTLs), and Breast Cancer Risk Variants

Author:

Ho Peh Joo123ORCID,Khng Alexis1ORCID,Tan Benita Kiat-Tee456ORCID,Khor Chiea Chuen17,Tan Ern Yu8910,Lim Geok Hoon11,Yuan Jian-Min1213ORCID,Tan Su-Ming14,Chang Xuling151617,Tan Veronique Kiak Mien56,Sim Xueling3ORCID,Dorajoo Rajkumar115ORCID,Koh Woon-Puay1819ORCID,Hartman Mikael2320ORCID,Li Jingmei12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore

2. Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore

3. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore

4. Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore

5. Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore

6. Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore

7. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore

8. Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore

9. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore 639798, Singapore

10. Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138673, Singapore

11. KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore

12. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA

13. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA

14. Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore

15. Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore

16. Khoo Teck Puat—National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore

17. Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

18. Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Singapore

19. Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 117609, Singapore

20. Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the association of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for functional genetic variants with the risk of developing breast cancer. Methods: Summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) and heterogeneity in dependent instruments (HEIDI) were used to identify breast cancer risk variants associated with gene expression and DNA methylation levels. A new SMR-based PRS was computed from the identified variants (functional PRS) and compared to an established 313-variant breast cancer PRS (GWAS PRS). The two scores were evaluated in 3560 breast cancer cases and 3383 non-cancer controls and also in a prospective study (n = 10,213) comprising 418 cases. Results: We identified 149 variants showing pleiotropic association with breast cancer risk (eQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 9, mQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 165). The discriminatory ability of the functional PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI]: 0.540 [0.526 to 0.553]) was found to be lower than that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI]: 0.609 [0.596 to 0.622]). Even when utilizing 457 distinct variants from both the functional and GWAS PRS, the combined discriminatory performance remained below that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous, combined [95% CI]: 0.561 [0.548 to 0.575]). A binary high/low-risk classification based on the 80th centile PRS in controls revealed a 6% increase in cases using the GWAS PRS compared to the functional PRS. The functional PRS identified an additional 12% of high-risk cases but also led to a 13% increase in high-risk classification among controls. Similar findings were observed in the SCHS prospective cohort, where the GWAS PRS outperformed the functional PRS, and the highest-performing PRS, a combined model, did not significantly improve over the GWAS PRS. Conclusions: While this study identified potentially functional variants associated with breast cancer risk, their inclusion did not substantially enhance the predictive accuracy of the GWAS PRS.

Funder

Agency for Science

National Medical Research Council, Singapore

Agency for Science, Technology and Research Career Development

Ministry of Health Healthy Longevity Catalyst Award

Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

National Institutes of Health

Cancer Research UK

European Union

National Research Foundation Singapore

National University Cancer Institute Singapore

Breast Cancer Prevention Programme

Singapore Ministry of Health

National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the United States

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3