Image Perceptual Similarity Metrics for the Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Author:

Spyridonos Panagiota1ORCID,Gaitanis Georgios2ORCID,Likas Aristidis3,Seretis Konstantinos4ORCID,Moschovos Vasileios4,Feldmeyer Laurence5,Heidemeyer Kristine5ORCID,Zampeta Athanasia2,Bassukas Ioannis D.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece

2. Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece

3. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece

4. Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece

5. Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Efficient management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) requires reliable assessments of both tumors and post-treatment scars. We aimed to estimate image similarity metrics that account for BCC’s perceptual color and texture deviation from perilesional skin. In total, 176 clinical photographs of BCC were assessed by six physicians using a visual deviation scale. Internal consistency and inter-rater agreement were estimated using Cronbach’s α, weighted Gwet’s AC2, and quadratic Cohen’s kappa. The mean visual scores were used to validate a range of similarity metrics employing different color spaces, distances, and image embeddings from a pre-trained VGG16 neural network. The calculated similarities were transformed into discrete values using ordinal logistic regression models. The Bray–Curtis distance in the YIQ color model and rectified embeddings from the ‘fc6’ layer minimized the mean squared error and demonstrated strong performance in representing perceptual similarities. Box plot analysis and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to visualize and compare the levels of agreement, conducted on a random validation round between the two groups: ‘Human–System’ and ‘Human–Human.’ The proposed metrics were comparable in terms of internal consistency and agreement with human raters. The findings suggest that the proposed metrics offer a robust and cost-effective approach to monitoring BCC treatment outcomes in clinical settings.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3