Evaluation of CIN2/3 Lesion Regression in GynTect® DNA Methylation-Marker-Negative Patients in a Longitudinal Study

Author:

Hoyer Heike1,Stolte Claudia2,Böhmer Gerd2,Hampl Monika3,Hagemann Ingke4ORCID,Maier Elisabeth5,Denecke Agnieszka6,Hirchenhain Christine7,Patzke Jan8,Jentschke Matthias9ORCID,Gerick Axel10,Heller Tabitha11,Hippe Juliane12,Wunsch Kristina12,Schmitz Martina12ORCID,Dürst Matthias13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Datenwissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany

2. Institut für Zytologie und Dysplasie (IZD), 30159 Hannover, Germany

3. Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

4. Abts+Partner Partnerschaftsgesellschaft, 24103 Kiel, Germany

5. Praxis Dr. Elisabeth Maier, 80796 München, Germany

6. Klinikum Wolfsburg, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany

7. Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

8. CytoConcept, 44145 Dortmund, Germany

9. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany

10. Praxis Dr. Axel Gerick, 52072 Aachen, Germany

11. Zentrum für Klinische Studien (ZKS), Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany

12. Ongnostics GmbH, 07749 Jena, Germany

13. Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 has a high spontaneous regression rate, especially among women ≤29 years of age. To reduce overtreatment, reliable prognostic biomarkers would be helpful. The main aim of this study was to analyze the negative predictive value of the methylation marker panel GynTect® for lesion regression. In this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational proof-of-concept study, women aged ≤29 years with histologically confirmed CIN2 (n = 24) or CIN3 (n = 36) were closely monitored without treatment for up to 24 or 12 months, respectively. The outcome was either regression, persistence, or progression of the lesion. For each patient, a single baseline sample (V0) for cytology, hrHPV detection and methylation analysis was taken. In a primary analysis, the negative predictive value (NPV) of a GynTect®-negative test result at V0 for regression was determined. We tested the null hypothesis NPV ≤ 70% against the alternative hypothesis NPV ≥ 90%. Twelve of the eighteen GynTect®-negative CIN2 patients showed regression (NPV = 67%, 90% CI 44–85%, p = 0.53). Of the 27 GynTect®-negative CIN3 lesions, 15 regressed (NPV = 56%, 90% CI 38–72%, p = 0.92). Although the majority of GynTect®-negative lesions regressed, the postulated NPV of ≥90% was not observed. Thus, the clinical relevance for an implementation of the GynTect® assay for patients undergoing watchful waiting remains questionable. Further studies with longer observation periods should be undertaken.

Funder

intramural funds

oncgnostics GmbH, Jena, Germany

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3