Precision Medicine Approach Based on Molecular Alterations for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the MM-EP1 Study

Author:

Andreozzi Fabio12,Dragani Matteo3,Quivoron Cyril45ORCID,Le Bras Fabien6,Assi Tarek3,Danu Alina3,Belhadj Karim6,Lazarovici Julien3,Cotteret Sophie7,Bernard Olivier A.5,Ribrag Vincent1345,Michot Jean-Marie135ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France

2. Hematology Department, Institute Jules Bordet, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium

3. Hematology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France

4. Translational Research Hematological Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France

5. INSERM U1170, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France

6. Hematology Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94000 Créteil, France

7. Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France

Abstract

Background: Despite that cytogenetic and molecular analysis of tumor cells can rapidly identify recurring molecular abnormalities, no personalized therapy is currently available in the setting of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (r/r MM). Methods: MM-EP1 is a retrospective study aimed at comparing a personalized molecular-oriented (MO) versus a non-molecular-oriented (no-MO) approach in r/r MM. Actionable molecular targets and their associated therapies were the BRAF V600E mutation and BRAF inhibitors; t(11;14)(q13;q32) and BCL2 inhibitors; and t(4;14)(p16;q32) with FGFR3 fusion/rearrangements and FGFR3 inhibitors. Results: One hundred three highly pretreated r/r MM patients with a median age of 67 years (range 44–85) were included. Seventeen (17%) patients were treated using an MO approach with BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib or dabrafenib, n = 6), BCL2 inhibitor (venetoclax, n = 9), or FGFR3 inhibitor (erdafitinib, n = 2). Eighty-six (86%) patients received non-MO therapies. Overall response rate was 65% in MO patients versus 58% in the non-MO group (p = 0.053). Median PFS and OS were 9 and 6 months (HR = 0.96; CI95 = 0.51–1.78; p = 0.88) and 26 and 28 months (HR = 0.98; CI95 = 0.46–2.12; p = 0.98), respectively, in MO and no-MO patients. Conclusion: Despite the low number of patients treated with an MO approach, this study highlights the strengths and weakness of a molecular-targeted approach for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Widespread biomolecular techniques and improvement of precision medicine treatment algorithms could improve selection for precision medicine in myeloma.

Funder

Institut Gustave Roussy

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3