Treatment Strategies for Glioblastoma in the Elderly: What Should We Focus on Compared to Younger Patients

Author:

Gull Hanah Hadice1234ORCID,Von Riegen Antonia Carlotta1ORCID,Beckmann Greta Theresa1ORCID,Ketelauri Pikria12,Walbrodt Sebastian12,Santos Alejandro N.12,Oster Christoph345ORCID,Schmidt Teresa345,Glas Martin2345,Jabbarli Ramazan12ORCID,Özkan Neriman12,Dammann Philipp12,Scheffler Björn34678,Sure Ulrich12ORCID,Ahmadipour Yahya1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

2. Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

3. DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the WTZ, DKTK Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

4. West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

5. Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

6. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

7. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

8. Center of Medical Biotechnology (ZMB), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

Abstract

(1) Background: Although the incidence of glioblastoma (GB) has a peak in patients aged 75–84 years, no standard treatment regimen for elderly patients has been established so far. The goal of this study was to analyze the outcome of GB patients ≥ 65 years to detect predictors with relevant impacts on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). (2) Methods: Medical records referred to our institution from 2006 to 2020 were analyzed. Adult GB patients with clinical data, postoperative MRI data, and ≥1 follow-up investigation after surgical resection were included. The complete cohort was divided into a younger (<65) and an elderly group (≥65 years). Multiple factors regarding OS and PFS were scanned using univariate and multivariable regression with p < 0.05. (3) Results: 1004 patients were included with 322 (61.0%) male individuals in the younger and 267 (56.1%) males in the older cohort. The most common tumor localization was frontal in both groups. Gross total resection (GTR) was the most common surgical procedure in both groups, followed by subtotal resection (STR) (145; 27.5%) in the younger group, and biopsy (156; 32.8%) in the elderly group. Multivariate analyses detected that in the younger cohort, MGMT promoter methylation and GTR were predictors for a longer OS, while MGMT methylation, GTR, and hypofractionated radiation were significantly associated with a longer OS in the elderly group. (4) Conclusions: Elderly patients benefit from surgical resection of GB when they show MGMT promoter methylation, undergo GTR, and receive hypofractionated radiation. Furthermore, MGMT methylation seems to be associated with a longer PFS in elderly patients. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings, especially within prospective radiation therapy studies and molecular examinations.

Funder

Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3