Preoperative Radiotherapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Compared to Chemoradiotherapy for cT3-4 Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Study

Author:

Engels Benedikt1,De Paoli Antonino2,Delmastro Elena3,Munoz Fernando4,Vagge Stefano5ORCID,Norkus Darius6,Everaert Hendrik7,Tabaro Gianna2ORCID,Gariboldi Elisabetta3ORCID,Ricardi Umberto4,Borsatti Eugenio2,Gabriele Pietro3,Innocente Roberto2,Palazzari Elisa2,Dubaere Emilie1,Mahé Marc-André8,Van Laere Sven1,Gevaert Thierry1ORCID,De Ridder Mark1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCC Candiolo, 10060 Candiolo, Italy

4. Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Martino-IST Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy

6. Department of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania

7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

8. Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France

Abstract

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for T3-4 rectal cancer. Here, we compared image-guided and intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) (instead of concomitant chemotherapy) versus CRT in a multi-centric randomized trial. Methods: cT3-4 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions plus capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (CRT arm) or IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions with an SIB to the rectal tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy (RTSIB arm). Results: A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned between April 2010 and May 2014. Grade 3 acute toxicities were 6% and 4% in the CRT and RTSIB arms, respectively. The mean fractional change in SUVmax at 5 weeks after completion of preoperative RT were −55.8% (±24.0%) and −52.9% (±21.6%) for patients in the CRT arm and RTSIB arm, respectively (p = 0.43). The pathologic complete response rate was 24% with CRT compared to 14% with RTSIB. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or local control (LC). Conclusions: The preoperative RTSIB approach was not inferior to CRT in terms of metabolic response, toxicity, OS, PFS and LC, and could be considered an available option for patients unfit for fluorouracil-based CRT.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Recent advances in rectal cancer treatment – are we on the right track?;Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences;2024-02-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3