Radiomics for Differentiation of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature

Author:

Garaba Alexandru12ORCID,Ponzio Francesco3ORCID,Grasso Eleonora Agata4,Brinjikji Waleed5,Fontanella Marco Maria1ORCID,De Maria Lucio16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy

2. Unit of Neurosurgery, Spedali Civili Hospital, Largo Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy

3. Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

4. Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA

5. Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

6. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Purpose: To better define the overall performance of the current radiomics-based models for the discrimination of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was designed and conducted by an experienced librarian. We estimated overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Event rates were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the χ2 test was performed to assess the heterogeneity. Results: Overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between MB, PA, and EP were found to be promising, with SEN values of 93% (95% CI = 0.88–0.96), 83% (95% CI = 0.66–0.93), and 85% (95% CI = 0.71–0.93), and corresponding SPE values of 87% (95% CI = 0.82–0.90), 95% (95% CI = 0.90–0.98) and 90% (95% CI = 0.84–0.94), respectively. For MB, there is a better trend for LR classifiers, while textural features are the most used and the best performing (ACC 96%). As for PA and EP, a synergistic employment of LR and NN classifiers, accompanied by geometrical or morphological features, demonstrated superior performance (ACC 94% and 96%, respectively). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance is high, making radiomics a helpful method to discriminate these tumor types. In the forthcoming years, we expect even more precise models.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3