Survival Evidence of Local Control for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases by Hepatectomy and/or Radiofrequency Ablation
Author:
Canseco Lariza Marie1, Liu Yueh-Wei2, Lu Chien-Chang3, Lee Ko-Chao3ORCID, Chen Hong-Hwa3, Hu Wan-Hsiang3, Tsai Kai-Lung3, Yang Yao-Hsu45, Wang Chih-Chi2, Hung Chao-Hung6ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, De Los Santos Medical Center, Quezon City 1112, MM, Philippines 2. Liver Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan 4. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan 5. Health Information and Epidemiology Laboratory of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan 6. Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
Abstract
Hepatectomy and/or local ablation therapy have been recommended for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). However, they still lack strong evidence for their survival benefits, in addition to systemic therapy. This study aims to evaluate the survival evidence of hepatectomy and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in CRLM patients from a large multi-institutional database. A total of 20,251 patients with colorectal cancer, 4521 of whom were with CRLM, were screened for eligibility. Finally, 2612 patients (637 hepatectomy, 93 RFA, 92 combined hepatectomy and RFA, and 1790 non-aggressive treatment) were enrolled. Frequency matching analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was as follows: hepatectomy alone was 47.8%, combined hepatectomy plus RFA was 35.9%, RFA alone was 29.2%, and the non-aggressive treatment group was 7.4%. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that hepatectomy, RFA, and combination were significantly associated with a better OS compared to those without aggressive local therapy (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that male gender (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81–0.97; p = 0.011), old age (≥60 years) (HR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09–1.32; p < 0.001), high CEA level (>5 ng/mL) (HR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.89–2.42; p < 0.001), primary right-sided cancer (HR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22–1.51; p < 0.001), extrahepatic metastasis (HR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33–1.60; p < 0.001), systemic therapy (HR 0.7; 95% CI, 0.62–0.79; p < 0.001), and aggressive local therapy (hepatectomy vs. non-local therapy HR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.20–0.26; p < 0.001; RFA vs. non-local therapy HR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.29–0.41; p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with OS. In the frequency matching analysis, patients receiving hepatectomy and/or RFA resulted in a better OS than those without (p < 0.001). In conclusion, aggressive local treatment provides survival advantages over systemic therapy alone among CRLM patients.
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference27 articles.
1. World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2023, June 02). GLOBOCAN 2020: Colorectal Cancer. Published December 2020. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/10_8_9-Colorectum-fact-sheet.pdf. 2. American Cancer Society (2020). Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020–2022, American Cancer Society. 3. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up;Cervantes;Ann. Oncol.,2023 4. Engstrand, J., Nilsson, H., Strömberg, C., Jonas, E., and Freedman, J. (2018). Colorectal cancer liver metastases—A population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer, 18. 5. Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based study;Cummings;Cancer,2007
|
|