Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response among Different Breast Cancer Subtypes

Author:

Vidali Sofia12ORCID,Irmici Giovanni3,Depretto Catherine3ORCID,Bellini Chiara1ORCID,Pugliese Francesca1ORCID,Incardona Ludovica Anna1ORCID,Di Naro Federica1,De Benedetto Diego1,Di Filippo Giacomo4ORCID,Ferraro Fabiola5,De Berardinis Claudia3,Miele Vittorio6ORCID,Scaperrotta Gianfranco3,Nori Cucchiari Jacopo1

Affiliation:

1. Breast Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy

2. Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy

3. Breast Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy

4. UOC Endocrinochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy

5. Department of Biomedicine Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy

6. Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) plays a crucial role in breast cancer (BC) treatment, both in advanced BC and in early-stage BC, with different rates of pathological complete response (pCR) among the different BC molecular subtypes. Imaging monitoring is mandatory to evaluate the NAT efficacy. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in BC patients undergoing NAT. This retrospective two-center study included 174 patients. The breast lesions were classified based on the molecular subtypes in hormone receptor (HR+)/HER2−, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The histopathological analysis performed following surgery was used as a reference standard for the pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were measured overall and for the different subtypes. We enrolled 174 patients, 79/174 (46%) HR+/HER2−, 59/174 (33.9%) HER2+, and 35/174 (20.1%) TNBC; the pCR was found in 64/174 (36.8%), of which 57.1% were TNBCs. In the total population, the CEM sensitivity and specificity were 66.2% and 75.2%, with a PPV of 61.4% and an NPV of 78.8%. The highest specificity (80.9%) and NPV (91.7%) were found in HR+/HER2−, while the highest sensitivity (70%) and PPV appeared (73.7%) in TNBC. The results indicate that CEM is a valid tool to assess the pCR, with different performances among the subtypes of BC.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3