Surgical and Oncologic Outcome following Sacrectomy for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors and Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Author:

Weidlich Anne1ORCID,Schaser Klaus-Dieter1,Weitz Jürgen2,Kirchberg Johanna2,Fritzmann Johannes2ORCID,Reeps Christian2,Schwabe Philipp3ORCID,Melcher Ingo3,Disch Alexander1,Dragu Adrian1ORCID,Winkler Doreen1,Mehnert Elisabeth1,Fritzsche Hagen1

Affiliation:

1. University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Sarcoma Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

2. Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, incl. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sarcoma Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

3. Department for Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Tumor Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, 13585 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Introduction: Bone sarcoma or direct pelvic carcinoma invasion of the sacrum represent indications for partial or total sacrectomy. The aim was to describe the oncosurgical management and complication profile and to analyze our own outcome results following sacrectomy. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, 27 patients (n = 8/10/9 sarcoma/chordoma/locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) were included. There was total sacrectomy in 9 (incl. combined L5 en bloc spondylectomy in 2), partial in 10 and hemisacrectomy in 8 patients. In 12 patients, resection was navigation-assisted. For reconstruction, an omentoplasty, VRAM-flap or spinopelvic fixation was performed in 20, 10 and 13 patients, respectively. Results: With a median follow-up (FU) of 15 months, the FU rate was 93%. R0-resection was seen in 81.5% (no significant difference using navigation), and 81.5% of patients suffered from one or more minor-to-moderate complications (especially wound-healing disorders/infection). The median overall survival was 70 months. Local recurrence occurred in 20%, while 44% developed metastases and five patients died of disease. Conclusions: Resection of sacral tumors is challenging and associated with a high complication profile. Interdisciplinary cooperation with visceral/vascular and plastic surgery is essential. In chordoma patients, systemic tumor control is favorable compared to LRRC and sarcomas. Navigation offers gain in intraoperative orientation, even if there currently seems to be no oncological benefit. Complete surgical resection offers long-term survival to patients undergoing sacrectomy for a variety of complex diseases.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3