Role of Isolated Limb Perfusion in the Era of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma. A Systematic Review of The Literature

Author:

Sevilla-Ortega Lourdes,Ferrándiz-Pulido Lara,Palazón-Carrión Natalia,Álamo de la Gala María del Carmen,de Toro-Salas Rubén,Garnacho-Montero José,Marcos-Rodríguez José Antonio,Agudo Martínez Ana,Araji-Tiliani Omar,Calvo-Morón María Cinta,Barquero-Aroca José Miguel,Fernández-López Antonio Ramón,Jaime-Borrego José María,Santos-Jiménez Juan Carlos,Moreno-Ramírez David,de la Cruz-Merino LuisORCID

Abstract

Background. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a locoregional procedure indicated by the unresectable melanoma of the limbs. Its complexity and highly demanding multidisciplinary approach means that it is a technique only implemented in a few referral centers around the globe. This report aims to examine its potential role in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy by conducting a systematic review of the literature on ILP. Methods. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. The eligibility criteria included publications from 2000–2020 providing valid data o effectiveness, survival or toxicity. Studies in which the perfusion methodology was not clearly described, letters to the editor, non-systematic reviews and studies that applied outdated clinical guidelines were excluded. To rule out studies of a low methodological quality and assess the risk of bias, the following aspects were also required: a detailed description of the applied ILP regimen, the clinical context, follow-up periods, analyzed clinical endpoints, and the number of analyzed ILPs. The disagreements were resolved by consensus. The results are presented in tables and figures. Results. Twenty-seven studies including 2637 ILPs were selected. The median overall response rate was 85%, with a median complete response rate of 58.5%. The median overall survival was 38 months, with a 5-year overall survival of 35%. The toxicity was generally mild according to Wieberdink toxicity criteria. Discussion. ILP still offer a high efficacy in selected patients. The main limitation of our review is the heterogeneity and age of most of the articles, as well as the absence of clinical trials comparing ILP with other procedures, making it difficult to transfer its results to the current era. Conclusions. ILP is still an effective and safe procedure for selected patients with unresectable melanoma of the limbs. In the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, ILP remains an acceptable and reasonable palliative treatment alternative, especially to avoid limb amputations. The ongoing clinical trials combining systemic therapies and ILP will provide more valuable information in the future to clarify the potential synergism of both strategies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference57 articles.

1. GLOBOCANhttps://gco.iarc.fr/

2. Predictors and Natural History of In-Transit Melanoma After Sentinel Lymphadenectomy

3. Patient experiences with isolated limb perfusion for malignant melanoma – A qualitative study

4. Chemotherapy of Cancer

5. Regional perfusion treatment with melphalan for melanoma in a limb: An evaluation of drug kinetics;Benckhuijsen;Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.,1988

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3