A Comparison of 7 Tesla MR Spectroscopic Imaging and 3 Tesla MR Fingerprinting for Tumor Localization in Glioma Patients

Author:

Lazen Philipp123ORCID,Lima Cardoso Pedro1ORCID,Sharma Sukrit1,Cadrien Cornelius12,Roetzer-Pejrimovsky Thomas4,Furtner Julia56,Strasser Bernhard1,Hingerl Lukas1ORCID,Lipka Alexandra1,Preusser Matthias7,Marik Wolfgang5ORCID,Bogner Wolfgang13,Widhalm Georg2ORCID,Rössler Karl23ORCID,Trattnig Siegfried138,Hangel Gilbert123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. High-Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

2. Department for Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

3. Christian Doppler Laboratory for MR Imaging Biomarkers, 1090 Vienna, Austria

4. Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

5. Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

6. Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Danube Private University, 3500 Krems, Austria

7. Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

8. Institute for Clinical Molecular MRI, Karl Landsteiner Society, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria

Abstract

This paper investigated the correlation between magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) in glioma patients by comparing neuro-oncological markers obtained from MRSI to T1/T2 maps from MRF. Data from 12 consenting patients with gliomas were analyzed by defining hotspots for T1, T2, and various metabolic ratios, and comparing them using Sørensen–Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and the distances between their centers of intensity (COIDs). The median DSCs between MRF and the tumor segmentation were 0.73 (T1) and 0.79 (T2). The DSCs between MRSI and MRF were the highest for Gln/tNAA (T1: 0.75, T2: 0.80, tumor: 0.78), followed by Gly/tNAA (T1: 0.57, T2: 0.62, tumor: 0.54) and tCho/tNAA (T1: 0.61, T2: 0.58, tumor: 0.45). The median values in the tumor hotspot were T1 = 1724 ms, T2 = 86 ms, Gln/tNAA = 0.61, Gly/tNAA = 0.28, Ins/tNAA = 1.15, and tCho/tNAA = 0.48, and, in the peritumoral region, were T1 = 1756 ms, T2 = 102 ms, Gln/tNAA = 0.38, Gly/tNAA = 0.20, Ins/tNAA = 1.06, and tCho/tNAA = 0.38, and, in the NAWM, were T1 = 950 ms, T2 = 43 ms, Gln/tNAA = 0.16, Gly/tNAA = 0.07, Ins/tNAA = 0.54, and tCho/tNAA = 0.20. The results of this study constitute the first comparison of 7T MRSI and 3T MRF, showing a good correspondence between these methods.

Funder

Austrian Science Fund

Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs

National Foundation for Research, Technology, and Development

Christian Doppler Research Association

Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3