FDG-PET in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T-Cell) Therapy Toxicity: A Systematic Review

Author:

Al-Ibraheem Akram12ORCID,Abdlkadir Ahmed Saad1ORCID,Lopci Egesta3ORCID,Allouzi Sudqi1,Paez Diana4,Alkuwari Maryam5ORCID,Makoseh Mohammad6ORCID,Novruzov Fuad7,Usmani Sharjeel8,Al-Rabi Kamal6ORCID,Mansour Asem9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Al-Jubeiha, Amman 11941, Jordan

2. School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan

3. Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy

4. Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1220 Vienna, Austria

5. Clinical Imaging Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 7GPR+3M9, Qatar

6. Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman 11941, Jordan

7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The National Centre of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Azerbaijan Republic, Baku AZ1012, Azerbaijan

8. Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, Muscat 5661, Oman

9. Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Al-Jubeiha, Amman 11941, Jordan

Abstract

The utilization of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy to target cluster of differentiation (CD)19 in cancer immunotherapy has been a recent and significant advancement. Although this approach is highly specific and selective, it is not without complications. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to assess the current state of positron emission tomography (PET) in evaluating the adverse effects induced by CAR T-cell therapy. A thorough search of relevant articles was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up until March 2024. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data, which was then organized and categorized using Microsoft Excel. The risk of bias and methodological quality was assessed. In total, 18 articles were examined, involving a total of 753 patients, in this study. A wide range of utilities were analyzed, including predictive, correlative, and diagnostic utilities. While positive outcomes were observed in all the mentioned areas, quantitative analysis of the included studies was hindered by their heterogeneity and use of varying PET-derived parameters. This study offers a pioneering exploration of this promising field, with the goal of encouraging further and more focused research in upcoming clinical trials.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3