Decoding the Prognostic Significance and Therapeutic Implications of Inflammation-Based Scores in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
Author:
Kotsifa Evgenia1ORCID, Machairas Nikolaos1ORCID, Angelis Apostolos1ORCID, Nikiteas Nikolaos I.1, Dimitroulis Dimitrios1, Sotiropoulos Georgios C.1
Affiliation:
1. 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens “Laiko”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, posing a significant global health challenge with an increasing incidence. In recent years, multiple staging systems and scores have been proposed, emphasising the necessity for the development of precise prognostic tools. The well-documented etiological relationship between chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis has prompted researchers to explore novel prognostic markers associated with the inflammatory status of HCC patients. This review summarises the current data about inflammation-based scores in the context of HCC. We discuss established scores like the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and others not as extensively studied, examining their utility in predicting survival outcomes and treatment response in HCC patients. Furthermore, we explore emerging scores, including the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and other lymphocyte-based scores, assessing their potential in refining risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions in the era of precision medicine. As research progresses and these scores undergo further refinement and integration into the evolving landscape of HCC management, they carry significant potential for improving patient outcomes.
Reference120 articles.
1. Hepatocellular carcinoma;Forner;Lancet,2018 2. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018). EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol., 69, 182–236. 3. Ioannou, G.N., Green, P., Lowy, E., Mun, E.J., and Berry, K. (2018). Differences in hepatocellular carcinoma risk, predictors and trends over time according to etiology of cirrhosis. PLoS ONE, 13. 4. Kotsifa, E., Vergadis, C., Vailas, M., Machairas, N., Kykalos, S., Damaskos, C., Garmpis, N., Lianos, G.D., and Schizas, D. (2022). Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Why, When, How?. J. Pers. Med., 12. 5. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up;Jelic;Ann. Oncol.,2010
|
|