The Potential for Targeting G2/M Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinases in Enhancing the Efficacy of Radiotherapy
Author:
Melia Emma1ORCID, Parsons Jason L.12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 2. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the main cancer treatments being used for ~50% of all cancer patients. Conventional radiotherapy typically utilises X-rays (photons); however, there is increasing use of particle beam therapy (PBT), such as protons and carbon ions. This is because PBT elicits significant benefits through more precise dose delivery to the cancer than X-rays, but also due to the increases in linear energy transfer (LET) that lead to more enhanced biological effectiveness. Despite the radiotherapy type, the introduction of DNA damage ultimately drives the therapeutic response through stimulating cancer cell death. To combat this, cells harbour cell cycle checkpoints that enables time for efficient DNA damage repair. Interestingly, cancer cells frequently have mutations in key genes such as TP53 and ATM that drive the G1/S checkpoint, whereas the G2/M checkpoint driven through ATR, Chk1 and Wee1 remains intact. Therefore, targeting the G2/M checkpoint through specific inhibitors is considered an important strategy for enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. In this review, we focus on inhibitors of Chk1 and Wee1 kinases and present the current biological evidence supporting their utility as radiosensitisers with different radiotherapy modalities, as well as clinical trials that have and are investigating their potential for cancer patient benefit.
Funder
Medical Research Council National Institutes of Health
Reference145 articles.
1. Vitti, E.T., and Parsons, J.L. (2019). The Radiobiological Effects of Proton Beam Therapy: Impact on DNA Damage and Repair. Cancers, 11. 2. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer;Paganetti;Phys. Med. Biol.,2014 3. Biological considerations when comparing proton therapy with photon therapy;Paganetti;Semin. Radiat. Oncol.,2013 4. Malouff, T.D., Mahajan, A., Krishnan, S., Beltran, C., Seneviratne, D.S., and Trifiletti, D.M. (2020). Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology. Front. Oncol., 10. 5. Mairani, A., Mein, S., Blakely, E., Debus, J., Durante, M., Ferrari, A., Fuchs, H., Georg, D., Grosshans, D.R., and Guan, F. (2022). Roadmap: Helium ion therapy. Phys. Med. Biol., 67.
|
|