Machine Learning of Multi-Modal Tumor Imaging Reveals Trajectories of Response to Precision Treatment

Author:

Mansouri Nesrin1ORCID,Balvay Daniel1ORCID,Zenteno Omar1ORCID,Facchin Caterina12ORCID,Yoganathan Thulaciga1ORCID,Viel Thomas1ORCID,Herraiz Joaquin Lopez3ORCID,Tavitian Bertrand14ORCID,Pérez-Liva Mailyn13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. INSERM, PARCC, Université Paris Cité, F-75015 Paris, France

2. Cancer Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center (RI-MUHC), Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada

3. Nuclear Physics Group and IPARCOS, Department of Structure of Matter, Thermal Physics and Electronics, CEI Moncloa, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

4. Radiology Department, AP-HP, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, F-75015 Paris, France

Abstract

The standard assessment of response to cancer treatments is based on gross tumor characteristics, such as tumor size or glycolysis, which provide very indirect information about the effect of precision treatments on the pharmacological targets of tumors. Several advanced imaging modalities allow for the visualization of targeted tumor hallmarks. Descriptors extracted from these images can help establishing new classifications of precision treatment response. We propose a machine learning (ML) framework to analyze metabolic–anatomical–vascular imaging features from positron emission tomography, ultrafast Doppler, and computed tomography in a mouse model of paraganglioma undergoing anti-angiogenic treatment with sunitinib. Imaging features from the follow-up of sunitinib-treated (n = 8, imaged once-per-week/6-weeks) and sham-treated (n = 8, imaged once-per-week/3-weeks) mice groups were dimensionally reduced and analyzed with hierarchical clustering Analysis (HCA). The classes extracted from HCA were used with 10 ML classifiers to find a generalized tumor stage prediction model, which was validated with an independent dataset of sunitinib-treated mice. HCA provided three stages of treatment response that were validated using the best-performing ML classifier. The Gaussian naive Bayes classifier showed the best performance, with a training accuracy of 98.7 and an average area under curve of 100. Our results show that metabolic–anatomical–vascular markers allow defining treatment response trajectories that reflect the efficacy of an anti-angiogenic drug on the tumor target hallmark.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference59 articles.

1. Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm;Tsimberidou;Cancer Treat. Rev.,2020

2. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis;Litjens;Med. Image Anal.,2017

3. A review of deep learning with special emphasis on architectures, applications and recent trends;Sengupta;Knowl. Based Syst.,2020

4. Hunter, R., and World Health Organization (WHO) (1979). Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment, WHO.

5. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors;Therasse;J. Natl. Cancer Inst.,2000

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3