Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

Author:

Kamecki Hubert1ORCID,Mielczarek Łukasz1,Szempliński Stanisław1,Dębowska Małgorzata2,Rajwa Paweł34,Baboudjian Michael5ORCID,Klemm Jakob36,Rivas Juan Gómez7,Modzelewska Elza1,Tayara Omar1,Malewski Wojciech1,Szostek Przemysław1,Poletajew Sławomir1ORCID,Kryst Piotr1ORCID,Sosnowski Roman8ORCID,Nyk Łukasz1

Affiliation:

1. Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland

2. Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland

3. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

4. Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

5. Department of Urology, North Hospital, AP-HM, 13007 Marseilles, France

6. Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

7. Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain

8. Department of Urology and Oncological Urology, Warmian-Masurian Cancer Center, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland

Abstract

Background: Data on Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) amount in biopsy tissue is important for prostate cancer (PC) risk assessment. We aim to investigate which GP4 quantification method predicts adverse pathology (AP) at radical prostatectomy (RP) the best in men diagnosed with intermediate-risk (IR) PC at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy. Methods: We retrospectively included 123 patients diagnosed with IR PC (prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/mL, grade group (GG) 2 or 3, no iT3 on MRI) at MRI-guided biopsy, who underwent RP. Twelve GP4 amount-related parameters were developed, based on GP4 quantification method (absolute, relative to core, or cancer length) and site (overall, targeted, systematic biopsy, or worst specimen). Additionally, we calculated PV×GP4 (prostate volume × GP4 relative to core length in overall biopsy), aiming to represent the total GP4 volume in the prostate. The associations of GP4 with AP (GG ≥ 4, ≥pT3a, or pN1) were investigated. Results: AP was reported in 39 (31.7%) of patients. GP4 relative to cancer length was not associated with AP. Of the 12 parameters, the highest ROC AUC value was seen for GP4 relative to core length in overall biopsy (0.65). an even higher AUC value was noted for PV × GP4 (0.67), with a negative predictive value of 82.8% at the optimal threshold. Conclusions: The lack of an association of GP4 relative to cancer length with AP, contrasted with the better performance of other parameters, indicates directions for future research on PC risk stratification to accurately identify patients who may not require immediate treatment. Incorporating formulas aimed at GP4 volume assessment may lead to obtaining models with the best discrimination ability.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3