Characteristics and Components of Self-Management Interventions for Improving Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Author:

Rimmer Ben12ORCID,Brown Morven C.12,Sotire Tumi2ORCID,Beyer Fiona2ORCID,Bolnykh Iakov3ORCID,Balla Michelle3,Richmond Catherine2ORCID,Dutton Lizzie12,Williams Sophie4,Araújo-Soares Vera125,Finch Tracy6,Gallagher Pamela7,Lewis Joanne4,Burns Richéal89,Sharp Linda12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

2. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK

3. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK

4. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

5. Centre for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Department for Prevention, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

6. Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK

7. School of Psychology, Dublin City University, D09 N920 Dublin, Ireland

8. Faculty of Science, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland

9. Health and Biomedical Strategic Research Centre, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland

Abstract

Self-management can improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors. Which intervention characteristics and components are beneficial is unclear, hindering implementation into practice. We systematically searched six databases from inception to 17 November 2021 for studies evaluating self-management interventions for adult cancer survivors post-treatment. Independent reviewers screened for eligibility. Data extraction included population and study characteristics, intervention characteristics (TIDieR) and components (PRISMS), (associations with) quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy, and economic outcomes. Study quality was appraised, and narrative synthesis was conducted. We identified 53 papers reporting 32 interventions. Studies had varying quality. They were most often randomised controlled trials (n = 20), targeted at survivors of breast (n = 10), prostate (n = 7), or mixed cancers (n = 11). Intervention characteristics (e.g., provider, location) varied considerably. On average, five (range 1–10) self-management components were delivered, mostly “Information about condition and its management” (n = 26). Twenty-two studies reported significant QoL improvements (6 also reported significant self-efficacy improvements); these were associated most consistently with combined individual and group delivery. Economic evaluations were limited and inconclusive. Self-management interventions showed promise for improving QoL, but study quality was variable, with substantial heterogeneity in intervention characteristics and components. By identifying what to adapt from existing interventions, these findings can inform development and implementation of self-management interventions in cancer.

Funder

Brain Tumour Charity

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3