Choice of Assessment and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer among Women with False-Positive Mammography Screening

Author:

Sardini Bayan12ORCID,Fogh Jørgensen Susanne1ORCID,Brønsro Larsen Lisbet3,Elhakim Mohammad Talal3ORCID,Njor Sisse Helle12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930 Randers, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark

3. Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Women with false-positive mammography screening results have a two- to four-fold higher risk of breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate if the subsequent risk of breast cancer after a false-positive mammography screening is associated with the received diagnostic assessment. The study population consisted of women who underwent false-positive mammography screening from January 2010 to June 2019. They were categorised into seven groups depending on the elements in the assessment (standard care: additional mammography, ultrasound, and if they had a relevant biopsy). Risks of interval cancer, next-round screen-detected cancer, and long-term breast cancer for non-standard care assessments were compared to standard care assessments using Binomial and Cox regression models. We included 44,279 women with a false-positive result. Invasive assessments that lacked an ultrasound or additional mammography were not more associated with an increased risk of subsequent cancers compared to that of ‘all three elements’. The few assessments that included ‘only ultrasound’ or ‘only mammography’ resulted in higher relative risks of next-round screen-detected cancer of 1.52 (95% CI: 0.93–2.47) and 1.67 (95% CI: 0.54–5.16), respectively, compared to that of standard care. The increased subsequent risk of breast cancer among women with a previous false-positive result was not found to be correlated with the choice of elements in the assessment process.

Funder

Helsefonden

Health Research Fund of the Central Denmark Region

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference30 articles.

1. Breast cancer risk for women with a false positive screening test;Peeters;Br. J. Cancer,1988

2. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features;Castells;Radiology,2016

3. Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: The role of misclassification;Kuchiki;Cancer Epidemiol.,2014

4. Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: Joint analysis of three national cohorts;Hofvind;Br. J. Cancer,2018

5. Risk of breast cancer after false-positive test results in screening mammography;Thorsted;J. Natl. Cancer Inst.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3