Treatment, Prognostic Markers, and Survival in Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors, with Special Reference to Temozolomide-Based Chemotherapy
Author:
Cheng Zixuan12ORCID, Yu Fuhuan12, Chen Ruao12, Cui Lingjun12, Chen Yingying12, Deng Chao2, Shi Yanfen3, Tan Huangying2
Affiliation:
1. Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China 2. Department of Integrative Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China 3. Department of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
Abstract
Background: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (Th-NETs) are rare and aggressive, with a scarcity of research on predicting patient prognosis. Our study aimed to assess the impact of prognostic markers and temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy on survival in Th-NETs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with Th-NETs between 2013 and 2023 at our institution. We collected clinicopathological data, including tumor pathological grading, staging, serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, levels of inflammatory factors, and expression of oxygen 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Treatment details (such as surgery and chemotherapy) and survival outcomes were also documented. Results: A total of 32 patients were included in our study after excluding those without complete available information. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months (95%CI, 8–16 months) for 19 patients who received TMZ-based chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery as the primary treatment, demonstrating a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 51.0 months. The inflammatory factor neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic indicator of DFS in postoperative patients and PFS in TMZ-treated patients. The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 86.6%, 69.5%, and 33.8%, respectively. Ki67 level exceeding 10% (p = 0.048) and absence of surgical resection (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS). Conclusion: Surgical treatment was currently the primary method for treating Th-NETs, and postoperative adjuvant therapy was an essential consideration for specific patient cohorts. Despite widespread positive MGMT expression, TMZ-based chemotherapy showed promise. Some potential prognostic biomarkers such as NLR and NSE need more attention.
Funder
National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding
Reference44 articles.
1. Tartarone, A., Lerose, R., Lettini, A.R., and Tartarone, M. (2023). Current Treatment Approaches for Thymic Epithelial Tumors. Life, 13. 2. Hsu, C.-H., Chan, J.K., Yin, C.-H., Lee, C.-C., Chern, C.-U., and Liao, C.-I. (2019). Trends in the Incidence of Thymoma, Thymic Car-cinoma, and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumor in the United States. PLoS ONE, 14. 3. Treatment, Prognostic Markers, and Survival in Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single Center Experience of 41 Patients;Ma;Medicine,2017 4. Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?;Volante;Endocr. Pathol.,2021 5. Chinese expert consensus on lung and thyus neuroendocrine neoplasms;Bai;Chin. J. Oncol.,2021
|
|