HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer Is the Future… and Always Will Be? Results from a Spanish Multicentric Survey

Author:

González Gil Alida1ORCID,Cerezuela Fernández-de Palencia Álvaro2,Gómez Ruiz Álvaro Jesús2,Gil Gómez Elena1,López Hernández Francisco2,Nieto Ruiz Aníbal3ORCID,Martínez Jerónimo4ORCID,Marhuenda Iván2,Cascales Campos Pedro Antonio1

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Cirugía, Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, 30120 Murcia, Spain

2. Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, 30120 Murcia, Spain

3. Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Unidad de Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, 30120 Murcia, Spain

4. Departamento de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, 30120 Murcia, Spain

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death due to gynecological tumors in the female population. Despite optimal first-line treatment, including cytoreduction and platinum-based systemic chemotherapy, recurrences are frequent. The use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been criticized, especially because of the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with convincing results to support the use of HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. In 2018, the clinical trial published by Van Driel et al. reported improved outcomes in favor of HIPEC treatment with cisplatin. In this study, we conducted a national survey within the Spanish group of peritoneal surgical oncology (Grupo Español de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, GECOP) to explore the impact of the results of this RCT on clinical practice. A total of 33 groups completed the survey. Routine clinical practice was not changed in 28 of the 33 groups (85%) based on the results of the Van Driel trial. Despite the results of this RCT, most groups considered that more RCTs are needed and that, in the future, HIPEC may become the standard of care. In conclusion, the results from RCTs evaluating HIPEC treatment in patients with ovarian cancer has not been transferred to clinical practice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3