Forestry Scenario Modelling: Qualitative Analysis of User Needs in Lithuania

Author:

Juknelienė Daiva1ORCID,Palicinas Michailas1,Valčiukienė Jolanta1,Mozgeris Gintautas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentų Str. 11, Akademija, 53361 Kaunas Distr., Lithuania

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate the use of qualitative research methods, specifically in-depth interviews, to explore the intangible and often difficult-to-quantify needs for forestry scenario modelling in Lithuania, which are frequently not adequately perceived. The study involved informants representing key actors in forest policy, forest management, research, and education. A total of 21 informants from 11 different institutions, which hold significant power and expertise in forest decision making, were interviewed. The purpose of these interviews was to gather their perspectives on the potential forest decision support system in the country, aiming to address most of their needs. The interview questions explored various aspects, including the requirements for forestry scenario modelling, the desired level of detail and information content for decision making, and both functional and nonfunctional requirements for the scenario modelling system. It is worth noting that the expected functionality of the planned forest DSSs aligns with modern international standards. Nevertheless, the diversity of perspectives, wishes, visions, and intentions of key Lithuanian forestry actors regarding the aims, objectives, and essential functionality of forestry scenario modelling tools were identified. The understanding of the requirements for modern forest DSSs was greatly influenced by the current forestry paradigms in the country and the professional experiences of individual informants. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the utilization of qualitative research, particularly through in-depth interviews, has proven to be a highly effective tool for accurately specifying the requirements of a modern forest DSS. It helped mitigate preconceived notions and address gaps in the envisioned product, specifically by developing a framework of core solutions for the national forestry and land-use scenario modelling system.

Funder

Horizon Europe Framework Programme

FOREST 4.0—Center of Excellence for the development of a sustainable forest bioeconomy

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. Recommendations for Standardized Documentation and Further Development of Forest Growth Simulators;Pretzsch;Forstwiss. Cent.,2002

2. Overview of methods and tools for evaluating future woody biomass availability in European countries;Barreiro;Ann. For. Sci.,2016

3. (2023, June 03). Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online: https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_.pdf.

4. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation;Grassi;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2017

5. Alternative forest management strategies to account for climate change-induced productivity and species suitability changes in Europe;Schelhaas;Reg. Environ. Chang.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3