Affiliation:
1. Department of Practical Philosophy, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Abstract
People harass people to defend and promote their fundamental beliefs, political ideologies, religious dogmas, and the Truth. They create these with marvelous lucidity and unnerving verve, spreading, guarding, and enforcing their convictions. Fanatical ideologies penetrate and pollute our life world like “lyrical leprosy”. We need a coping strategy. Conformists may want to go along and join the perpetrators, whomever they happen to be. Activists fight ideological pollution, a risky strategy. Indifference and apathy do not pollute others and are less dangerous than rebelling. Following E. M. Cioran, I discuss three defensive strategies: those of a skeptic, an idler, and an aesthete. I reject trivializing the third strategy; instead, I discuss an ironist’s options. A recommendable route to indifference is to read the Truth metaphorically and ironize it. This voids its contents, and the result is adiaphora. We can also start with irony and metaphorize it. Such linguistic–aesthetic methods thwart the viperous dogmas that otherwise harass us from the cradle to the grave. The Truth is a treacherous construct. How to avoid it? How to deflect ideologically motivated terror?
Reference28 articles.
1. Kotsko, Adom (2013). The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, Stanford University Press.
2. Irony and Sarcasm in Ethical Perspective;Airaksinen;Open Philosophy,2020
3. Airaksinen, Timo (2021). Metaphysics, Universal Irony, and Richard Rorty’s ‘We Ironists’. Humanities, 10.
4. El sentimiento de muerte como límite existencial en la obra de E.M. Cioran;Ideas Y Valores,2017
5. Bertolucci, Bernardo (1970). Il Conformista, Paramount.