Can Sea Surface Waves Be Simulated by Numerical Wave Models Using the Fusion Data from Remote-Sensed Winds?

Author:

Shi Jian1,Shao Weizeng2ORCID,Shi Shaohua3,Hu Yuyi2,Jiang Tao2,Zhang Youguang4

Affiliation:

1. College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

2. College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China

3. East China Sea Survey Center, Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200137, China

4. National Satellite Ocean Application Service, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China

Abstract

The purpose of our work is to investigate the performance of fusion wind from multiple remote-sensed data in forcing numeric wave models, and the experiment is described herein. In this study, 0.125° gridded wind fields at 12 h intervals were fused by using swath products from an advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) (a Haiyang-2B (HY-2B) scatterometer) and a spaceborne polarimetric microwave radiometer (WindSAT) during the period November 2019 to October 2020. The daily average wind speeds were compared with observations from National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoys from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), yielding a 1.66 m/s root mean squared error (RMSE) with a 0.81 correlation (COR). This suggests that fusion wind was reliable for our work. The fusion winds were used for hindcasting sea surface waves by using two third-generation numeric wave models, denoted as WAVEWATCH-III (WW3) and Simulation Wave Nearshore (SWAN). The WW3-simulated waves in the North Pacific Ocean and the SWAN-simulated waves in the Gulf of Mexico were validated against the measurements from the NDBC buoys and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA-5) for the period June−September 2020. The analysis of significant wave heights (SWHs) up to 9 m yielded a < 0.5 m RMSE with a > 0.8 COR for the WW3 and SWAN models. Therefore, it was believed that the accuracy of the simulation using the two numeric models was comparable with that forced by a numeric atmospheric model. An error analysis was systematically conducted by comparing the modeled WW3-simulated SWHs with the monthly average products from the HY-2B and a Jason-3 altimeter over global seas. The seasonal analysis showed that the differences in the SWHs (i.e., altimeter minus the WW3) were within ±1.5 m in March and June; however, the difference was quite significant in December. It was concluded that remote-sensed fusion wind can serve as a driving force for hindcasting waves using numeric wave models.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference57 articles.

1. Wind and wave climate in the Arctic Ocean as observed by Altimeters;Liu;J. Clim.,2016

2. ERS Scatterometer Wind data impact on ECMWF’s tropical cyclone forecasts;Isaksen;IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,2000

3. Comparison of wind data from QuikSCAT and buoys in the Indian Ocean;Satheesan;Int. J. Remote Sens.,2007

4. The CMOD7 Geophysical model function for ASCAT and ERS wind retrievals;Stoffelen;IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens.,2017

5. Evaluation of sea surface winds and waves retrieved from the Chinese HY-2B data;Shao;IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens.,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3