Tailored Basic Life Support Training for Specific Layperson Populations—A Scoping Review

Author:

Schnaubelt Sebastian1234ORCID,Veigl Christoph12ORCID,Snijders Erwin3ORCID,Abelairas Gómez Cristian56ORCID,Neymayer Marco12,Anderson Natalie7ORCID,Nabecker Sabine8ORCID,Greif Robert910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

2. PULS—Austrian Cardiac Arrest Awareness Association, 1090 Vienna, Austria

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium

4. Emergency Medical Service Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria

5. Faculty of Education Sciences and CLINURSID Research Group, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

6. Simulation and Intensive Care Unit of Santiago (SICRUS) Research Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela—CHUS, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

7. Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand

8. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada

9. Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland

10. School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Background: Basic life support (BLS) is a life-saving link in the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest chain of survival. Most members of the public are capable of providing BLS but are more likely to do so confidently and effectively if they undertake BLS training. Lay members of the public comprise diverse and specific populations and may benefit from tailored BLS training. Data on this topic are scarce, and it is completely unknown if there are any benefits arising from tailored courses or for whom course adaptations should be developed. Methods: The primary objective of this scoping review was to identify and describe differences in patient, clinical, and educational outcomes when comparing tailored versus standard BLS courses for specific layperson populations. This review was undertaken as part of the continuous evidence evaluation process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results: A primary search identified 1307 studies and after title, abstract, and full-text screening, we included eight publications reporting on tailored courses for specific populations. There were no studies reporting direct comparisons between tailored and standardized training. Seven (88%) studies investigated courses tailored for individuals with a disability, and only one study covered another specific population group (refugees). Overall, the quality of evidence was low as the studies did not compare tailored vs. non-tailored approaches or consisted of observational or pre–post-designed investigations. Conclusions: Tailored BLS education for specific populations is likely feasible and can include such groups into the pool of potential bystander resuscitation providers. Research into comparing tailored vs. standard courses, their cost-to-benefit ratio, how to best adapt courses, and how to involve members of the respective communities should be conducted. Additionally, tailored courses for first responders with and without a duty to respond could be explored.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference61 articles.

1. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Systems saving lives;Semeraro;Resuscitation,2021

2. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation;Greif;Resuscitation,2021

3. ERC (2024, March 16). Bringing Resuscitation to the World. Available online: https://www.erc.edu/courses/basic-life-support.

4. Basic Life Support (BLS) (2024, March 16). CprHeartOrg. Available online: https://cpr.heart.org/en/cpr-courses-and-kits/healthcare-professional/basic-life-support-bls-training.

5. The World Restart a Heart Initiative: How to save hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide;Rott;Curr. Opin. Crit. Care,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3