Affiliation:
1. School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Prom Sir-William-Osler, Montréal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada
2. Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Site of CISSS-Laval (Center of Integrated Health and Social Services of Laval) (CISSS-Laval), Research Site of the Montreal Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), Laval, QC H7V 1R2, Canada
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a major cause of global disability. Many ABI patients exhibit oculomotor dysfunctions that impact their daily life and rehabilitation outcomes. Current clinical tools for oculomotor function (OMF) assessment are limited in their usability. In this proof-of-principle study, we aimed to develop an efficient tool for OMF screening and to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and relevance in a small sample of ABI and control participants. Methods: We created the Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) by reviewing existing OMF assessments. ROSE was pilot-tested on ABI patients (n = 10) and age-matched controls (n = 10). Data regarding the characteristics of the assessment, such as the duration, level of participant comprehension, and participant experience were also collected. Results: ROSE takes <20 min (x¯ = 12.5), is easy to complete (agreement x¯ = 4.6/5), and is well-accepted (x¯ = 4.8/5). Patients scored higher in all subtests and total score (x¯ = 34.8 for ABI vs. 8.9 for controls). Most subtests did not provoke any symptoms, especially for controls. There were no significant between-group differences in symptom provocation. This proof-of-principle study shows that ROSE is feasible, acceptable, and relevant for adult ABI patients. Conclusions: ROSE needs further evaluation for reliability testing and validation in larger samples and diverse neurological conditions. Establishing norms for various ages, sexes, and populations should be considered for the deployment of ROSE as an OMF clinical tool.
Funder
JRH Foundation
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy of McGill University
Reference14 articles.
1. Conn, P.M. (2003). The oculomotor System. Neuroscience in Medicine, Humana Press. [2nd ed.].
2. Oculomotor assessment tool (OMAT) test procedure and normative data;Yarmouth;Optom. Vis. Sci.,2021
3. The knowledge base of the oculomotor system;Land;Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B,1997
4. (2022, October 01). Northern Brain Injury Association. Available online: https://www.nbia.ca/.
5. Sinauer Associates (2001). The vestibular system. Neuroscience, Sinauer Associates. [2nd ed.].