Oral Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps after Cancer Ablation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Author:

Accorona Remo1,Di Furia Domenico1,Cremasco Alice12,Gazzini Luca3,Mevio Niccolò1,Pilolli Francesco1,Achena Andrea1ORCID,Iftikhar Haissan4,Awny Shadi5,Ormellese Giorgio Luigi1,Dragonetti Alberto Giulio1,De Virgilio Armando6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy

2. Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy

3. Division of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, “San Maurizio” Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B75 7RR, UK

5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt

6. Department of Organ of Sense, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: The planning of oral reconstruction after tumor resection is a pivotal point for head and neck surgeons. It is mandatory to consider two aspects: the size of the surgical defect and the complexity of the oral cavity as an anatomical region. We offer a review of the literature that focuses on four types of locoregional flaps that can be profitably used for such reconstruction: infrahyoid (IF), nasolabial (NF), platysma (PF), and submental (SF). Methods: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review was carried out according to the PICOS acronym through a comprehensive electronic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. For each selected article, we extrapolated eight main parameters, of which all mean values were compared through an ANOVA test. The dimensions of the oral defects were referred to as “small” (<7 cm2), “medium” (7–50 cm2), or “large” (>50 cm2). Results: A total of 139 articles were selected with a total of 5898 patients. The mean ages for each type of flap were not statistically significant (p = 0.30, p > 0.05). Seven sublocations of oral defects were reported: The most common was the tongue (2003 [34.0%] patients), followed by the floor of the mouth (1786 [30.4%]), buccal mucosa (981 [16.6%]), cheek (422 [7.2%]), hard palate (302 [5.1%]), alveolar ridge (217 [3.7%]), and retromolar trigone (187 [3.2%]). The defects were mainly medium-sized (4507 [76.4%] patients), and fewer were small-sized (1056 [17.9%]) or large-sized (335 [5.7%]). Complications were noted, the most frequent of which was flap necrosis, seen in 0.57% of cases. The functional and esthetical results were mainly positive. Conclusions: Locoregional flaps represent a good alternative in medium-sized defects as well as a fairly good alternative in small- and large-sized defects when other options are ruled out.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference90 articles.

1. Closure of palatal fistula with facial artery musculomucosal flap;Ashtiani;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2005

2. Versatiliy of the buccinator myomucosal flap in atypical palate reconstructions;Franco;J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg.,2014

3. Primary Abbe flap for median cleft lip deformity: New trends on an old concept;Steinberg;J. Craniofacial Surg.,2016

4. Tongue flap for reconstruction of the lips after electrical burns;Zareem;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,1974

5. Oncologic safety of facial artery myomucosal flaps in oral cavity reconstruction;Ferrari;Head Neck,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3