Affiliation:
1. Department of Business Administration, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh
2. Department of Sustainability Management, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
3. Department of Accounting and Economics, School of Economic and Management Sciences, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley 8301, South Africa
Abstract
South Asia is the most vulnerable region in the context of global warming, climate change, and climate risk. Climate finance is the most useful tool for combating climate challenges worldwide. The study explores the present picture of climate finance in South Asian (SA) countries. The study uses multilateral development bank (MDB), Green Climate Fund (GCF), and Germanwatch supplied data from 2011 to 2021. Under the theoretical lens of institutional capacity development, the study attempts to correlate climate finance and climate risk. The study indicates an increasing trend of MBDs’ and the GCF’s climate finance in many countries worldwide. The study finds that MDBs’ total global climate finance is USD 446,977 million, while the SA region has received USD 59,301 million since 2011. It also reports that MDBs provide 77% and 23% of the money to the mitigation and adaptation areas. Moreover, the study reports that, after COVID-19, MDBs substantially increased the amount of global climate financing, but this increase was not seen in the SA region. Our climate risk data indicate that most of the SA countries are highly long-term climate risky and lose, on average, 0.378% of GDP. The correlation matrix finds a negative and significant correlation between climate finance and long-term and yearly climate risk. The study identifies that the region’s climate financing flow of money is not rationally distributed based on the short-run and long-run climate risks. The study presumes that more climate finance would be the most effective mechanism to mitigate climate risk. Therefore, SA region leadership drastically requires a holistic framework to address the prevailing climate problems and to ensure regional coordination and cooperation toward climate finance and policies. The research findings have significant implications for climate policy and climate finance.
Funder
Noakhali Science and Technology University
Reference60 articles.
1. Global warming has increased global economic inequality;Diffenbaugh;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2019
2. Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China;Liu;Nat. Hazards,2019
3. Climate mitigation finance in leveraging private investments in Indonesia;Halimanjaya;J. Sustain. Finance Invest.,2017
4. Can climate finance in Bangladesh be helpful in making transformational change in ecosystem management?;Tashmin;Environ. Syst. Res.,2016
5. Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., and Dahe, Q. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献