Affiliation:
1. Sport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia
Abstract
The sport and athletic performance industry has seen a plethora of new recovery devices and technologies over recent years, and it has become somewhat difficult for athletes, coaches, and practitioners to navigate the efficacy of such devices or whether they are even required at all. With the increase in recovery devices and tools, it has also become commonplace for athletes to overlook more traditional, well-established recovery strategies. In this narrative review, we discuss recovery strategies in relation to the hierarchy of scientific evidence, classifying them based on the strength of the evidence, ranging from meta-analyses through to case studies and reports. We report that foam rolling, compression garments, cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, hydrotherapy, and active recovery have a high level of positive evidence for improved recovery outcomes, while sauna, recovery boots/sleeves, occlusion cuffs, and massage guns currently have a lower level of evidence and mixed results for their efficacy. Finally, we provide guidance for practitioners when deciding on recovery strategies to use with athletes during different phases of the season.
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference98 articles.
1. Perceptions and use of recovery strategies: Do swimmers and coaches believe they are effective?;Shell;J. Sports Sci.,2020
2. Recovery from training: A brief review: Brief review;Bishop;J. Strength Cond. Res.,2008
3. van Someren, K., and Howatson, G. (2011). Sports Injuries, Oxford University Press.
4. Recovery review: Science vs. practice;Vaile;J. Aust. Strength Cond.,2010
5. Crowther, F., Sealey, R., Crowe, M., Edwards, A., and Halson, S. (2017). Team sport athletes’ perceptions and use of recovery strategies: A mixed-methods survey study. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil., 9.