Incorporating Social and Policy Drivers into Land-Use and Land-Cover Projection
-
Published:2023-09-27
Issue:19
Volume:15
Page:14270
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Abbasnezhad Behnoosh1ORCID, Abrams Jesse B.12ORCID, Hepinstall-Cymerman Jeffrey1
Affiliation:
1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 2. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Abstract
Forestlands in the southeastern U.S. generate a great variety of ecosystem services that contribute to the well-being of humans and nonhumans alike. Despite their importance, forests continue to be lost to other land uses such as agricultural production and urban development. Advancements in remote sensing and machine learning techniques have facilitated land use/land cover (LULC) change projections, but many prior efforts have neglected to account for social and policy dimensions. We incorporated key socio-economic factors, conservation policies, societal preferences, and landscape biophysical features into LULC projection techniques under four different development scenarios. We applied this approach in the Upper Flint watershed, which flows south from the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area and is characterized by extensive urbanization and associated deforestation. Our results suggest that incorporating social and policy drivers in future LULC projection approaches leads to more realistic results with higher accuracy levels, offering decision-makers, development planners, and policymakers better opportunities to forecast the effects of anticipated changes on the availability of ESs in the future. Conservation organizations and public agencies can benefit from such analysis to identify regions requiring conservation interventions for prioritizing their conservation efforts. We used publicly available data for the conterminous U.S., hence our approach can be replicable in other study regions within the nation.
Funder
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture McIntire Stennis
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference97 articles.
1. The Causes of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Moving beyond the Myths;Lambin;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2001 2. Nabuurs, G.-J., Mrabet, R., Abu Hatab, A., Bustamante, M., Clark, H., Havlík, P., House, J., Mbow, C., Ninan, K.N., and Popp, A. (2023). Climate Change 2022—Mitigation of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 3. Spatially Explicit Modeling of 1992–2100 Land Cover and Forest Stand Age for the Conterminous United States;Sohl;Ecol. Appl.,2014 4. Assessing the Impacts of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Service Values in Rib Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia;Anley;Trees For. People,2022 5. A Review of Machine Learning and Big Data Applications in Addressing Ecosystem Service Research Gaps;Manley;Ecosyst. Serv.,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|