Inclusion of Beef Heart in Ground Beef Patties Alters Quality Characteristics and Consumer Acceptability as Assessed by the Application of Electronic Nose and Tongue Technology

Author:

Douglas Savannah L.1,Bernardez-Morales Gabriela M.1,Nichols Brooks W.1ORCID,Johnson Gabriella F.1,Barahona-Dominguez Linda S.2,Jessup Ainsley P.2,Belk Aeriel D.1ORCID,Ball Jase J.1ORCID,Cho Sungeun2,Sawyer Jason T.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA

2. Department of Poultry Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA

Abstract

Consumer purchasing of beef is often driven by the trinity of flavor, palatability, and convenience. Currently, beef patties in the United States are manufactured with fat and lean trimmings derived from skeletal muscles. A reduction in total beef supply may require the use of animal by-product utilization such as variety meats to achieve patty formulations. The current study aimed to assess textural, color, and flavor characteristics in addition to volatile compounds through electronic technology, e-nose and e-tongue, of ground beef patties formulated with beef heart. Ground beef patties were manufactured with 0%, 6%, 12%, or 18% beef heart, with the remainder of the meat block being shoulder clod-derived ground beef. Patties (n = 65/batch/treatment) within each batch (n = 3) with each treatment were randomly allocated to cooked color (n = 17/batch/treatment), Allo–Kramer shear force (AKSF; n = 17/batch/treatment), texture profile analysis (TPA; n = 6/batch/treatment), cooking loss (n = 17/batch/treatment), consumer panel (n = 3/batch/treatment), e-nose (n = 1/batch/treatment), and e-tongue (n = 1/batch/treatment) analysis groups. Patties containing beef heart did not require additional cooking time (p = 0.1325) nor exhibit greater cooking loss (p = 0.0803). Additionally, inclusion rates of beef heart increased hardness (p = 0.0030) and chewiness values (p = 0.0316) in TPA, were internally redder (p = 0.0001), and reduced overall liking by consumer panelists (p = 0.0367). Lastly, patties containing beef heart exhibited greater red-to-brown (p = 0.0003) and hue angle (p = 0.0001) values than control patties. The results suggest that beef heart inclusion does alter ground beef quality characteristics and consumer acceptability.

Funder

Agricultural Research Service, the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Alabama Cattlemen’s Association Beef Research Producer

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference50 articles.

1. Lau, C.S., Fugloni, V.L., Van Elswyk, M.E., and McNeill, S.H. (2023). Trends in Beef Intake in the United States: Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2018. Nutrients, 15.

2. Davis, C.G., Lin, B.H., and Factors Affecting U.S (2023, October 16). Beef Consumption, United States Department of Agriculture, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/37388/29633_ldpm13502_002.pdf?v=638.3.

3. (2024, January 22). Today’s Beef Consumer, Fall Update, Beef Research. Available online: https://www.beefresearch.org/resources/market-research-planning/white-papers/todays-beef-consumer-fall-2023-update.

4. (2024, January 22). Ground Beef Performance, Beef Research. Available online: https://www.beefitswhatsfordinner.com/retail/sales-data-shopper-insights/ground-beef-performance-sales-trends-by-leanness-form-and-primal.

5. Speer, N., Brink, T., and McCully, M. (2023, October 16). Changes in the Ground Beef Market and What it Means for Cattle Producers. Available online: https://www.angus.org/Foundation/Files/Research/WP_GroundBeefMarket.pdf.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3