Confronting Views of Companies and Authorities on Food Safety Issues—A Cross-Country Survey

Author:

Djekic Ilija1ORCID,Hambardzumyan Garegin2,Nikolić Aleksandra3ORCID,Mujčinović Alen3ORCID,Nakov Dimitar4ORCID,Nikolova Aleksandra Silovska5,Semenova Anastasia A.6ORCID,Kuznetsova Oksana A.6,Oz Fatih7ORCID,Oz Emel7ORCID,Terjung Nino8ORCID,Volker Heinz8,Tomasevic Igor18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia

2. Veterinary Sanitary Examination, Food Safety and Hygiene Department, Armenian National Agrarian University, Yerevan 0009, Armenia

3. Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

4. Faculty of Agriculture, “Goce Delčev” University in Štip, 2000 Shtip, North Macedonia

5. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, SS Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Shtip, North Macedonia

6. V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems, Moscow 107023, Russia

7. Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25030, Türkiye

8. DIL German Institute of Food Technology, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany

Abstract

This study investigated food safety issues as perceived by food companies and food safety authorities in six countries in Europe and Central Asia. A total of 66 companies and 16 authorities participated in the survey. The results provide important insights related to what the main food safety priorities are, how they are addressed in the countries that participated in the survey, and what the role of the main stakeholders is in the food value chain. Almost 50% of food companies identified ‘food fraud’ as the most influential food safety attribute. One-third of food safety authorities recognized ‘food safety management system’ as the most influential food safety attribute. Principal component analysis separated food safety statements into two dimensions named ‘food safety hazards and risks’ and ‘food safety system’. Although there are slight differences in food safety statements between the two stakeholders, i.e., food companies and food safety authorities, it is the country of origin that plays a more important role in understanding their views. Food companies will need to implement a systemic approach and transform the entire food value chain continuum while considering new food safety challenges. It is expected that food safety authorities will have to play a more proactive role in the future.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference60 articles.

1. (2020). Rev. 5-2020 General Principles of Food Hygiene in Codex Alimentarius Commission—International Food Standards (Standard No. CXC-1 1969).

2. OHCHR (2023, May 01). Key Aspects of the Right to Food. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/foodborne-disease-estimates/en/.

3. Quality and food safety issues revealed in certified food companies in three Western Balkans countries;Djekic;Food Control,2011

4. Gupta, R.K., and Singh, M. (2017). Food Safety in the 21st Century, Academic Press.

5. Developing systems to control food adulteration;Manning;Food Policy,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3