Impact of PV and EV Forecasting in the Operation of a Microgrid
-
Published:2024-07-31
Issue:3
Volume:6
Page:591-615
-
ISSN:2571-9394
-
Container-title:Forecasting
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Forecasting
Author:
Manzolini Giampaolo1ORCID, Fusco Andrea1, Gioffrè Domenico1, Matrone Silvana1, Ramaschi Riccardo1, Saleptsis Marios1, Simonetti Riccardo1ORCID, Sobic Filip1ORCID, Wood Michael James1ORCID, Ogliari Emanuele1ORCID, Leva Sonia1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy
Abstract
The electrification of the transport sector together with large renewable energy deployment requires powerful tools to efficiently use energy assets and infrastructure. In this framework, the forecast of electric vehicle demand and solar photovoltaic (PV) generation plays a fundamental role. This paper studies the impact of forecast accuracy on total electric cost of a simulated electric vehicles (EVs) charging station coupled with true solar PV and stationary battery energy storage. The optimal energy management system is based on the rolling horizon approach implemented in with a mixed integer linear program which takes as input the EV load forecast using long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network and persistence approaches and PV production forecast using a physical hybrid artificial neural network. The energy management system is firstly deployed and validated on an existing multi-good microgrid by achieving a discrepancy of state variables below 10% with respect to offline simulations. Then, eight weeks of simulations from each of the four seasons show that the accuracy of the forecast can increase operational costs by 10% equally distributed between the PV and EV forecasts. Finally, the accuracy of the combined PV and EV forecast matters more than single accuracies: LSTM outperforms persistence to predict the EV load (−30% root mean squared error), though when combined with PV forecast it has higher error (+15%) with corresponding higher operational costs (up to 5%).
Funder
European Commission
Reference53 articles.
1. EEA (2024, April 09). EEA Greehouse Gases—Data Viewer. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer. 2. IEA (2024, April 11). Global EV Outlook 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023. 3. Alrubaie, A.J., Salem, M., Yahya, K., Mohamed, M., and Kamarol, M. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations with Solar Photovoltaic System Considering Market, Technical Requirements, Network Implications, and Future Challenges. Sustainability, 15. 4. Grid Impact of Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Stations: Trends, Standards, Issues and Mitigation Measures—An Overview;Wang;IEEE Open J. Power Electron.,2021 5. Deeum, S., Charoenchan, T., Janjamraj, N., Romphochai, S., Baum, S., Ohgaki, H., Mithulananthan, N., and Bhumkittipich, K. (2023). Optimal Placement of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in an Active Distribution Grid with Photovoltaic and Battery Energy Storage System Integration. Energies, 16.
|
|