Viability of Human Arterial Grafts Monitored by Comet Assay
-
Published:2024-04-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:217-225
-
ISSN:1802-9973
-
Container-title:Physiological Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Physiol Res
Author:
Pilin A, Mazura I, Lainková R, Salmay M, Měřička P, Pecha O, Janoušek L, Grus T, Špunda R, Lindner J, Špaček M1
Affiliation:
1. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. miroslav.spacek@vfn.cz
Abstract
An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay.
Keywords: Arterial grafts • Cryopreservation • Cadaveric • Multiorgan procurement • Viability • Comet assay
Publisher
Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Reference16 articles.
1. Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Štádler P, Adamec M, Vlachovský R, Guňka I, Navrátil P, Thieme F, Špunda R, Burkert J, Staffa R, Němec P, Lindner J. Current vascular allograft procurement, cryopreservation and transplantation techniques in the Czech Republic. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28:529-534. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/90037 2. Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Štádler P, Adamec M, Vlachovský R, Guňka I, Navrátil P, Thieme F, Mitáš P, Špunda R, Špatenka J, Staffa R, Němec P, Lindner J. Organization model for allotransplantations of cryopreserved vascular grafts in Czech Republic. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018;19:437-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-018-9691-4 3. Měřička P, Janoušek L, Benda A, Lainková R, Sabó J, Dalecká M, Prokšová P, Salmay M, Špunda R, Pecha O, Jandová M, Gregor J, Štěrba L, Špaček M, Lindner J. Cell viability assessment using fluorescence vital dyes and confocal microscopy in evaluating freezing and thawing protocols used in cryopreservation of allogeneic venous grafts. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910653 4. Špunda R, Hrubý J, Měřička P, Mlček M, Pecha O, Splith K, Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Lindner J, Matia I, Spacek M. Immunosuppressive protocols with tacrolimus after cryopreserved aortal allotransplantation in rats. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201984 5. Hrubý J, Špunda R, Měřička P, Mlček M, Pecha O, Splith K, Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Lindner J, Špaček M, Matia I. Influence of the new standardized clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol on immunogenicity of arterial allografts in rats. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230234
|
|