Affiliation:
1. University of Adelaide
2. Centre for Marine Socioecology
Abstract
Biodiversity laws around the world differ, but, at their core, these laws promote the fundamental objective of preventing environmental decline and species extinctions. A variety of legal mechanisms have been implemented in domestic laws around the world to achieve this objective, including protection for habitat, environmental impact assessments and threatened species recovery plans. In many jurisdictions, if these mechanisms fail to protect a species, it may be legally declared extinct, or added to a formal list of those that have been lost. This paper examines the purpose and implications of extinction, from a legal perspective. A legal power to recognise a species as extinct has the potential to foster ambition, transparency and rigorous measurement of progress against conservation goals. However, in practice, efforts to prevent extinction are applied selectively. Without an obligation to learn from extinctions, recognition of species extinctions in law may have perverse effects, or no effect at all. This paper considers how law might play a more productive and positive role in preventing extinctions and improving conservation outcomes.
Reference2 articles.
1. Implications of extinction in law: Preventing, declaring and learning from species extinctions
2. PC. McCormack (2018) The legislative challenge of facilitating climate change adaptation for biodiversity. Australian Law Journal 92, 546–562