Abstract
Background: Most research examining first responders of terrorist incidents has been conducted in early post-disaster periods, utilized quantitative research methods, and focused on psychopathology such as post-traumatic stress.
Methods: Longitudinal follow-up assessments of 124 workers from 181 baseline volunteer rescue and recovery workers originally studied were completed nearly a quarter century after the terrorist bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Open-ended qualitative interviews were used in the follow-up study.
Results: The rescue and recovery work, vividly described decades later, was gruesome. These workers’ descriptions captured their mental toughness and their professional missions, as well as the emotional and mental health (MH) toll on their lives.
Conclusions: The extreme nature of rescue and recovery work in the aftermath of terrorism suggests potential utility for MH interventions to address the psychological toll that can be expected of human beings under the most extraordinary circumstances.
Publisher
Weston Medical Publishing
Reference17 articles.
1. Garbern SC, Ebbeling LG, Bartels SA: A systematic review of health outcomes among disaster and humanitarian responders. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016; 31(6): 635-642. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X16000832.
2. Wilson LC: A systematic review of probable posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders following man-made mass violence. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 229: 21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.015.
3. Zhang G, Pfefferbaum B, Narayanan P, et al.: Psychiatric disorders after terrorist bombings among rescue workers and bombing survivors in Nairobi and rescue workers in Oklahoma city. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2016; 28(1): 22-30.
4. North CS, Tivis L, McMillen JC, et al.: Psychiatric disorders in rescue workers after the Oklahoma city bombing. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(5): 857-859.
5. Bromet EJ, Hobbs MJ, Clouston SA, et al.: DSM-IV post-traumatic stress disorder among world trade center responders 11-13 years after the disaster of 11 September 2001 (9/11). Psychol Med. 2016; 46(4): 771-783. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715002184.