Author:
Shatpattananunt Boonyapat,Petpichetchian Wongchan,Kietmaneerut Srisuruk,Wuttipan Nathamon,Keawdounglek Vivat,Singtorn Jadsadaporn
Abstract
Interfacility transfers of patients in rural mountain areas have many issues that require further investigation; for example, lack of resources and the inability to provide appropriate treatments for a patient’s conditions are the reasons for interfacility transfer. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted to explore the experience of hill tribe people (n = 16) and healthcare providers (n = 22) regarding emergency medical conditions and interfacility transfer in rural mountain areas of northern Thailand. Data were collectedfrom February to July 2019 via in-depth interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the content analysis procedure of Elo and Kyngäs was used for data analysis. The study’s trustworthiness was established using Lincoln and Guba’s criteria. The finding revealed four categories reflecting hill tribe people’s experience of emergency medical conditions and interfacility transfer: 1) perceived barriers to rapid access, 2) helping hands, 3) the polarity of interfacility transfer services, and 4) ways toward a bright future. The healthcare providers’ experience was divided into three categories consisting of 1) the district system of interfacility transfer, 2) making it work: the three sources of power, and 3) hope for better interfacility transfer. These findings may contribute to a better comprehension of the nurses and healthcare providers who actively provide interfacility transfer support for emergency medical conditions suitable for hill tribe populations and healthcare settings.
Publisher
Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council
Reference37 articles.
1. World Health Organization, International Committee of the Red Cross ( ICRC) . Basic emergency care: approach to the acutely ill and injured: participant workbook [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 20]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/275635
2. Lawrence DS, Ssali A, Jarvis JN, Seeley J. Clinical research for life‑threatening illnesses requiring emergency hospitalisation: a critical interpretive synthesis of qualitative data related to the experience of participants and their caregivers. Trials [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 20];24:149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07183-6
3. Razzak J, Usmani MF, Bhutta ZA. Global, regional and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 Global Burden of Disease Study. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4:e000733. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000733.
4. Pittalis C, Brugha R, Gajewski J. Surgical referral systems in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the evidence. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 20];14(9): e0223328. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223328
5. McNaughton CD, Bonnet K, Schlundt D, Mohr NM, Chung S, Kaboli PJ, Ward MJ. Rural interfacility emergency department transfers: framework and quality analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(4):858-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46059.