Sustainable Production of Fertilizers via Photosynthetic Recovery of Nutrients in Livestock Waste
Author:
Gonz�lez Leonardo D.1, Mills Celeste2, Mungu�a-L�pez Aurora del C.1, Zavala Victor M.1
Affiliation:
1. University of Wisconsion-Madison, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Madison, WI, USA 2. Texas A&M University, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, TX, USA
Abstract
Increases in population and improvements in living standards have significantly increased the demand for animal products worldwide. However, modern livestock agriculture exerts significant pressure on the environment due to high material and energy requirements. These systems also generate significant amounts of waste that can cause severe environmental damage when not handled properly. Thus, if we wish to enable farmers to meet this increased demand in a sustainable way, technology pathways must be developed to convert livestock agriculture into a more circular economy. With this end in mind, we propose a novel framework (which we call ReNuAl) for the recovery of nutrients from livestock waste. ReNuAl integrates existing technologies with a novel biotechnology approach that uses cyanobacteria (CB) as a multi-functional component for nutrient capture and balancing, purifying biogas, and capturing carbon. The CB can be applied to crops, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers like diammonium phosphate. Using manure profiles obtained from dairy farms in the Upper Yahara region of Wisconsin, we construct a case study to analyze the environmental and economic impacts of ReNuAl. Our results illustrate that the minimum selling price (MSP) of CB fertilizer produced from deploying ReNuAl at a 1000 animal unit (AU) farm is significantly higher than the cost of synthetic fertilizers. We also observe that ReNuAl can return environmental benefits in areas such as climate change and nutrient runoff when compared to current practices. As a result, we see that consideration of environmental incentives can significantly increase the economic viability of the process.
Reference23 articles.
1. Makkar HPS. Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal 12:1744-1754 (2018) 2. Kim D, Stoddart N, Rotz CA, Veltman L, Chase J, Ingraham P, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Gaillard R, Aguirre-Villegas HA, Larson RA, Ruark M, Salas W, Joillet O, Thoma GJ. Analysis of beneficial management practices to mitigate environmental impacts in dairy production systems around the Great Lakes. Agricultural Systems 176:102660 (2019) 3. Leytem AB, Williams P, Zuidema S, Martinez A, Chong YL, Vincent A, Vincent A, Cronan D, Kliskey A, Wulfhorst JD, Alessa L, Bjorneberg D. Cycling phosphorus and nitrogen through cropping systems in an intensive dairy production region. Agronomy 11:1005 (2021) 4. Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19:292-305 (2009) 5. Larson RA, Sharara M, Good LW, Porter P, Runge R, Zavala V, Sampat A, Smith A. Evaluation of Manure Storage Capital Projects in the Yahara River Watershed. University of Wisconsin-Extension, University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Biological Systems Engineering technical report (2016)
|
|