Conceptual Design of Integrated Energy Systems with Market Interaction Surrogate Models
Author:
Chen Xinhe1, Tumbalam-Gooty Radhakrishna23, Guittet Darice4, Knueven Bernard4, Siirola John D.5, Dowling Alexander W.1
Affiliation:
1. University of Notre Dame, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, South Bend, IN 46556, United States 2. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA 15236, United States 3. NETL Support Contractor, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, United States 4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, United States 5. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, United States
Abstract
Most integrated energy system (IES) optimization frameworks employ the price-taker approximation, which ignores important interactions with the market and can result in overestimated economic values. In this work, we propose a machine learning surrogate-assisted optimization framework to quantify IES/market interactions and thus go beyond price-taker. We use time series clustering to generate representative IES operation profiles for the optimization problem and use machine learning surrogate models to predict the IES/market interaction. We quantify the accuracy of the time series clustering and surrogate models in a case study to optimally retrofit a nuclear power plant with a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer to co-produce electricity and hydrogen.
Reference22 articles.
1. Arent, D. J., Bragg-Sitton, S. M., Miller, D. C., Tarka, T. J., Engel-Cox, J. A., Boardman, R. D., ... and Garfield, D. J. Multi-input, multi-output hybrid energy systems. Joule, 5(1), 47-58 (2021). 2. Laky, D.J., Tumbalam-Gooty, R., Jaffe, T., Holly, M., Atia, A., Chen, X., & Dowling, A.W. IDAES-PSE Software Tools for Optimizing Energy Systems and Market Interactions. FOCAPD, 2024. 3. Lee, A., Ghouse, J.H., Eslick, J.C., Laird, C.D., Siirola, J.D., Zamarripa, M.A., Gunter, D., Shinn, J.H., Dowling, A.W., Bhattacharyya, D. and Biegler, L.T. The IDAES process modeling framework and model library-Flexibility for process simulation and optimization. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, 3(3), p.e10095 (2021). 4. Sorourifar, F., Zavala, V.M. and Dowling, A.W. 5. Martinek, J., Jorgenson, J., Mehos, M., and Denholm, P. A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants. Applied energy, 231, 854-865 (2018).
|
|