Affiliation:
1. Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon
2. Lebanese Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility adoption among organizations continues across different sects. This research explores the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility performance by family firms. Second, the researchers examined the extent of non-family firms' Corporate Social Responsibility performance. The adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility among organizations has continued to take pace. Corporate Social Responsibility involves activities that go beyond a business's everyday operations to focus on achieving social good. For instance, in order to show how companies, place much importance on Corporate Social Responsibility, the findings expressed in different studies show that Corporate Social Responsibility contributes towards increased stock returns, increased access to financing, creates an opportunity for companies to merge, and creates an avenue for firms to reduce on the cost of their capital. However, only a few studies have shown that Corporate Social Responsibility depends on a few determinants such as regulations, characteristics of chief executive officers, political affiliations, and national institutions. The research adopted questionnaire instruments to collect primary data through a survey approach from respondents from family and non-family-controlled companies. The findings showed that family firms recorded lower Corporate Social Responsibility performance than non-family-controlled firms.
Publisher
International Association for Digital Transformation and Technological Innovation
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference29 articles.
1. Abdullah, H., & Valentine, B. (2009). Fundamental and ethics theories of corporate governance. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 4(4), 88-96.
2. Adawi, M., & Rwegasira, K. (2012). The Influence of Patterns of Ownership Structure on Transparency in Corporate Governance (Evidence from United Arab Emirates Listed Companies). Journal of Transnational Management, 17(4), 239–257.
3. Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science, 49, 209–237.
4. Anderson, R., Mansi, S., & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency Cost of debt. Journal of Finance and Economics, 68, 263–285
5. Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: the role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11,107–127