Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need for advanced development of the regulatory framework for the practical application of artificial intelligence technologies and regulation of property turnover of objects equipped with artificial intelligence technologies.
Theoretical framework: The combination of information studied in advance by several authors and with the contribution of the findings presented in this work allows maximizing the knowledge of future researchers who decide to study and to determine the role of artificial intelligence within the framework of legal relations. The rapid development of AI technologies raises questions about the need to establish legal norms and regulation.
Design/methodology/approach: The research method is a comparative analysis of the current state and legal regulation of artificial intelligence technologies, a conceptual assessment of the impact and characteristics of legal risks of using artificial intelligence technologies.
Findings: This study emphasizes the importance of developing appropriate regulations and preparing the legal field for the wider adoption of artificial intelligence.
Research, Practical & Social implications: The authors analyze different points of view on how AI should be perceived - as an object of legal regulation or as a subject of law. The authors conclude that artificial cognitive capacity today's intelligence has not yet reached a level of development that allows it to replicate the thought processes of a lawyer in resolving a legal dispute. In addition, artificial intelligence has a huge potential to become an indispensable technological "assistant" of the lawyer, contributing to the improvement of quality and efficiency of legal services.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Subject
Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference19 articles.
1. Andreev, Yu. N. (2005). Participation of the State in civil-law relations. R. Aslanov Publishing House "Legal Centre Press", 2005
2. Asaro, P. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 4(14), 20–24.
3. Begishev, I. R., Latypova, E. Yu., & Kirpichnikov, D. V. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a legal category: doctrinal approach to the development of the definition. Current Problems of Economics and Law, 14(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.1.79-91
4. Buchanan, B. G., & Headrick, T. E. (1970). Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23(1), 40–62. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/867
5. Calo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563.